Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

formulations is used, what he has stated would not constitute proof that something self-subsisting other than a body can be situated in a spatial direction. We shall now present his argument. He said:

“We say: If the Exalted Creator were situated in a spatial direction, He would either occupy more than one spatial locus or occupy only one. The first alternative is untenable, because what occupies one of the two loci would either be identical to what occupies the second or be something different. The former is untenable; otherwise, one and the same thing would occupy two loci simultaneously, which is impossible. If this were conceivable, its equivalent should also be conceivable for a body, such that a single body could occupy two loci simultaneously; yet this is impossible.

“The second possibility is also impossible. First, it would entail the division of His essence, which is impossible, as previously explained. Second, each of His parts being confined to its particular locus would be either necessary or contingent. Both alternatives are untenable, as will be explained.

“As for the assertion that He occupies a single spatial locus, it is untenable for two reasons. First, He would then be of the smallest possible size, and Allah is exalted above that. Second, His occupying that locus would be either necessary or not necessary. The former is untenable, for if His occupying that locus were possible while His occupying any other locus were impossible,

العبارات قيل لم يكن ما ذكره دليلاً على إمكان أن يكون في الجهة قائم بنفسه غير الجسم ونحن نذكر حجته قال فنقول الباري تعالى لو كان حصوله في جهة لكان إما أن يكون في أكثر من حيز واحد أو لا يكون إلا في حيز واحد والأول باطل لأن الحاصل في أحد الحيزين إما أن يكون هو الحاصل في الحيز الثاني أو غيره والأول باطل وإلا لكان الشيء الواحد حاصلاً دفعة واحدة في حيزين وهو محال ولو عقل ذلك فليعقل مثله في الجسم حتى يحصل الجسم الواحد دفعة واحدة في حيزين وأنه محال والثاني أيضاً محال أما أولاً فلأنه يلزم منه انقسام ذاته وهو محال على ما مر وأما ثانياً فلأن اختصاص كل جزء منه بحيزه إما أن يكون واجباً أو جائزاً والقسمان باطلان على ما سيأتي وأما إن قيل بأنه في حيز واحد فهو باطل لوجهين الأول بأنه يكون أقل القليل ويتعالى الله عنه والثاني فلأن حصوله في ذلك الحيز إما أن يكون واجباً أو غير واجب والأول باطل إذ لو صح حصوله في ذلك الحيز وامتنع حصوله في سائر الأحياز

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies