or rejected? If it is accepted, his entire argument is invalidated, since he affirms a living, knowing, powerful being who neither moves nor remains still, neither draws near nor becomes distant, and performs no act Himself; yet you claim that He is neither powerless nor constrained nor prevented from acting. If it is rejected, then the analogies you have drawn to deny the reality of what the truthful and trusted one reported about Him are invalidated—for he knows Him better than you and your like do.