Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

with no existence. If self-evident knowledge is attained there despite this difficulty, then it is all the more assured here, where that difficulty is absent.”

He also said in his Nihāya, on this very question of direction, what we shall quote from him at the end of these arguments:

“If Allah were situated in a spatial locus, this would either be necessary or not necessary. The former is false, for if His being situated in that locus were possible, while His being situated in all other loci were impossible, then the essence of that locus would differ from the essence of all the other loci. If that were so, spatial loci would be positive realities, since one instance of pure nonexistence cannot differ from another. If spatial loci were positive realities, it would either be possible to point to them physically or not. If it were possible, then that thing would either be divisible—in which case the Creator situated within it would be divisible—or it would be indivisible, in which case that

لا وجود له فإذا كان العلم الضروري حاصلاً هناك مع هذا الإشكال فهاهنا مع عدم ذلك الإشكال أولى وقال أيضًا في نهايته في مسألة الجهة بعينها ما سنذكره عنه في آخر هذه الحجج وهو قوله لو كان الله حاصلاً في الحيز لكان إما أن يكون واجبًا أو غير واجب والأول باطل إذ لو صح حصوله في ذلك الحيز وامتنع حصوله في سائر الأحياز كان حقيقة ذلك الحيز مخالفة لحقيقة سائر هذه الأحياز ولو كان كذلك لكانت الأحياز أمورًا وجودية لأن العدم الصرف يستحيل أن يخالف بعضه بعضًا ولو كانت الأحياز أمورًا وجودية لكان إما أن تُمْكن الإشارة الحسية إليها أو لا يمكن فإن أمكن فذلك الشيء إما أن يكون منقسمًا فيكون الباري الحال فيه منقسمًا أو لا يكون منقسمًا فيكون ذلك

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies