Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

yourselves, along with all others who affirm the divine attributes, concede that every existent can be perceived by the senses, and that whatever cannot be perceived by the senses is nonexistent. Many among the people of the Sunnah and hadith say that He can also be touched, and you mean that He can be perceived through the five senses. You establish this just as you establish that He has spatial location and magnitude. Yet knowledge of this did not depend upon knowing that He has spatial location and magnitude.

If you have said that He is described as more contemptible than an indivisible atom, then, if He cannot be perceived by the senses or pointed to, you must accept either that He is nonexistent or that He has spatial location and magnitude. If you say that He can be perceived by the senses, this invalidates your assertion here that He cannot be perceived by the senses or pointed to.

This objection raised by the disputant is commendable in sound reasoning and fair debate, for it exposes his opponent’s inconsistency and the weakness of

أنتم وسائر الصفاتية تسلمون أن كل موجود فإنه يمكن أن يحس وأن الذي لا يمكن إحساسه هو المعدوم وكثير من أهل السنة والحديث يقولون بأنه يلمس أيضًا وأنتم تريدون أنه يدرك بالحواس الخمس وأنتم تثبتون هذا مثل إثبات أنه ذو حيز ومقدار ولم يكن العلم بذلك موقوفًا على العلم بأنه ذو حيز ومقدار وإذا كنت قد قلت إن كونه موصوفًا بأنه أحقر من الجوهر الفرد فإذا كان لا يحس ولا يشار إليه فقد لزمك إما أن يكون معدومًا أو يكون ذا حيز ومقدار وإذا قلت إنه يحس بطل ما ذكرته هنا من أنه لا يحس ولا يشار إليه وهذا الذي يورده المنازع حُمِّد في النظر الصحيح في المناظرة العادلة فإِنه يظهر به من تناقض منازعه وضعف

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies