Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

the position of the Karrāmiyyah contradicted what is self-evident to reason.”

The response is this: either the judgment and testimony of this reason, whose self-evident judgments their position contradicts, are accepted in matters of lordship, or they are rejected. If they are not accepted, then contradicting reason does no harm to these people or anyone else. It is then like an unrighteous witness, concerning whom Allah Most High says:

“If an evildoer brings you news, verify it.” [al-Hujurāt 6]

If, however, its judgment and testimony are accepted, then this opponent and those who agree with him contradict it more seriously than these people do, as has already been explained. If their position contradicts what is self-evident to reason more seriously than the position of these people, then these people are not obliged to abandon the position that contradicts it less. Rather, on this assumption, both groups would be obliged to acknowledge what is self-evident to reason, and thus all acknowledge that He is above

قول الكرامية على خلاف بدهية العقل يقال هذا العقل الذي هذا على خلاف بديهته إما أن يكون حكمه وشهادته في الربوبية مقبولاً أو مردودًا فإن لم يكن مقبولاً لم يضر هؤلاء ولا غيرهم مخالفته فإنه بمنزلة الشاهد الفاسق الذي قال الله تعالى فيه إِن جَاءكُمْ فَاسِقٌ بِنَبَأٍ فَتَبَيَّنُوا [الحجرات ٦] وإن كان حكمه وشهادته مقبولاً كان هذا المنازع وموافقوه أعظم مخالفة له من هؤلاء كما قد تقدم بيان ذلك وإذا كان مخالفة قولهم لبديهة العقل أعظم من قول هؤلاء لم يجب على هؤلاء أن يرجعوا عن القول الذي هو أقل مخالفة لبديهة العقل بل يكون الواجب على هذا التقدير على الطائفتين الاعتراف بما في بديهة العقل فيعترفون جميعًا بأنه فوق

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies