Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

about His saying:

“The Most Merciful rose above the Throne” {5} [Tā Hā 5].

He replied: “Rising above is not unknown; its manner is beyond comprehension. Believing in it is obligatory, and asking about it is an innovation.”

He said: “Whoever goes beyond these reports transmitted from the Successors and those who followed them among the righteous predecessors and the leading hadith scholars has transgressed, gone astray, and introduced into the religion something that does not belong to it.” He then mentioned the remainder of the book. These are his exact words.

Thus, if the position of Ibn Kullāb, al-Ashʿarī, and the leading scholars among his followers—which they stated was agreed upon by the early generations of the Muslim community and Ahl al-Sunnah—is that Allah is above the Throne and that He has a Face and two Hands, upholding the texts indicating that He is above the Throne and affirming that interpreting istawā (rose above) as istawlā (gained mastery over) is the interpretation of those who espouse falsehood, and so forth, then it is clear that this al-Rāzī and those like him are the ones who disagree

عن قوله الرَّحْمَنُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ اسْتَوَى {٥} [طه ٥] فقال الاستواء غير مجهول والكيف غير معقول والإيمان به واجب والسؤال عنه بدعة قال فمن تجاوز هذا المروي من الأخبار عن التابعين ومن بعدهم من السلف الصالحين وأئمة الحديث فقد تعدى وضل وابتدع في الدين ما ليس منه وذكر باقي الكتاب وهذا لفظه فإذا كان قول ابن كلاب والأشعري وأئمة أصحابه وهو الذي ذكروا أنه اتفق عليه سلف الأمة وأهل السنة وأن الله فوق العرش وأن له وجهًا ويدين وتقرير ما ورد من النصوص الدالة على أنه فوق العرش وأن تأويل استوى بمعنى استولى هو تأويل المبطلين ونحو ذلك علم أن هذا الرازي ونحوه هم المخالفون

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies