Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

and al-Qādī Abū al-Husayn and Abū, although they disagree with him concerning some of what he affirmed, either because the hadith is weak or because it does not clearly support his conclusion.

As for likening, in the terminology of the speculative theologians and others, it means asserting equivalence. Two similar things are two equivalents: either can take the place of the other and serve as its substitute. They disagree over whether similarity in this sense of equivalence is possible in one respect but not another, and whether it consists in the entities themselves or in the attributes inhering in them.

This kind of likening is also excluded with respect to Allah. The only dissenters in this regard are those who liken and equate Him with creation, whom the imams described and condemned, as Imām Ahmad said:

والقاضي أبي الحسين وأبي وإن كانوا يخالفونه في أشياء مما أثبتها إما لضعف الحديث أو لضعف دلالته وأما التشبيه فهو اصطلاح المتكلمين وغيرهم هو التمثيل والمتشابهان هما المتماثلان وهما ما سد أحدهما مسد صاحبه وقام مقامه وناب منابه وبينهم نزاع في إمكان التشابه الذي هو التماثل من وجه دون وجه وهل التشابه الذي هو التماثل بنفس الذوات أو بالصفات القائمة بالذوات وهذا التشبيه أيضًا منتف عن الله وإنما خالف فيه المشبهة الممثلة الذين وصفهم الأئمة وذموهم كما قال الإمام أحمد

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies