Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

other passages that make this clear.

Some of Imam Ahmad’s followers thought that these two statements contradicted one another, and thus reported two positions from him concerning the affirmation of a limit for Allah Most High. This is the approach of the two transmitted positions and the two interpretive views. Others denied that His exalted Essence has a limit and denied that His servants have knowledge of it, supposing this to be the implication of Hanbal’s report. They interpreted the reports of al-Marwadhī, al-Athram, Abū Dāwūd, and others affirming a limit for Him as referring instead to the affirmation of a limit for the Throne. Still others explained the matter in accordance with what both statements indicate, or interpreted the denial of a limit in another sense.

Denial was the approach initially taken by al-Qādī Abū Ya‘lā in al-Mu‘tamad and elsewhere: he used to deny both a limit and a direction. This was his earlier position. He said:

“Section: Allah has described Himself as rising over the Throne

غير هذا الموضع ما يبين ذلك وأصحاب الإمام أحمد منهم من ظن أن هذين الكلامين يتناقضان فحكي عنه في إثبات الحد لله تعالى روايتين وهذه طريقة الروايتين والوجهين ومنهم من نفى الحد عن ذاته تعالى ونفى علم العباد به كما ظنه موجَبُ ما نقله حنبل وتأول ما نقله المروذي والأثرم وأبو داود وغيرهم من إثبات الحد له على أن المراد إثبات حد للعرش ومنهم من قرر الأمر كما يدل عليه الكلامان أو تأول نفي الحد بمعنى آخر والنفي هو طريقة القاضي أبي يعلى أولاً في المعتمد وغيره فإنه كان ينفي الحد والجهة وهو قوله الأول قال فصل وقد وصف الله نفسه بالاستواء على العرش

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies