Al-Tafsīr al-QayyimIbn al-Qayyim

as a noun, and the noun it qualifies may appropriately be omitted, as with “the Muslim,” “the unbeliever,” “the righteous,” “the wicked,” “the distant,” “the near,” “the witness,” “the ruler,” and similar expressions. Here, omitting the qualified noun is better than mentioning it.

This distinction is preferable to the blanket prohibition adopted by those who disallow such omission without distinguishing between cases.

Further evidence that waswās is an adjective rather than a verbal noun is that, as explained above, the pattern fa‘lāl occurs more commonly as an adjective than as a verbal noun. Had a verbal noun been intended, it would have been preceded by dhū (“possessor of”), eliminating ambiguity and establishing its status as a verbal noun. When an expression admits two equally plausible interpretations, some contextual indication is needed to determine which is intended. How much more so when its adjectival use is more common than its use as a verbal noun!

This differs from sawm (“fasting”), fitr (“breaking the fast”), and similar expressions, which are verbal nouns that cannot be confused with adjectives. When they are used adjectivally, it is understood either that a preceding governing noun has been omitted, or that the verbal noun is being treated as an adjective for emphasis. These are the two ways of analysing such usage.

It is therefore established that al-waswās is Satan himself: it denotes an entity, not a verbal noun. And Allah knows best.

Section

As for al-khannās (“the one who repeatedly retreats”), it follows the pattern fa‘‘āl, from khanasa, yakhnusu, meaning to withdraw from sight and conceal oneself.

An example is the statement of Abū Hurayra: “The Prophet ﷺ met me on one of the streets of Medina while I was in a state of major ritual impurity, so I slipped away from him.”

The word properly means disappearing after having been visible, not merely being concealed. This is why the stars are described by it in Allah’s words (81:15):

“So I swear by the retreating stars.”

Qatāda said: “These are the stars: they appear at night and retreat by day, disappearing from sight.” Likewise, ‘Alī, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “They are the stars, which retreat by day and cannot be seen.”

مجرى الاسم، ويحسن حذف الموصوف: كالمسلم والكافر، والبر، والفاجر، والقاصي، والداني، والشاهد والوالي، ونحو ذلك. فحذف الموصوف هنا أحسن من ذكره. وهذا التفصيل أولى من إطلاق من منع حذف الموصوف ولم يفصل. ومما يدل على أن الوسواس وصف لا مصدر: أن الوصفية أغلب على فعلال من المصدرية كما تقدم. فلو أريد المصدر لأتى بذو المضافة إليه ليزول اللبس وتتعين المصدرية. فإن اللفظ إذا احتمل الأمرين على السواء فلا بد من قرينه تدل على تعيين أحدهما. فكيف والوصفية أغلب عليه من المصدرية؟. وهذا بخلاف صوم وفطر وبابهما، فإنهما مصادر لا تلتبس بالأوصاف. فإذا جرت أوصافا علم أنها على حذف مضاف، أو تنزيلا للمصدر منزلة الوصف، مبالغة، على الطريقتين في ذلك. فتعين أن «الوسواس» هو الشيطان نفسه. وأنه ذات لا مصدر. والله أعلم. فصل وأما الخناس: فهو فعّال، من خنس يخنس: إذا توارى واختفى. ومنه قول أبي هريرة «لقيني النبي ﷺ في بعض طرق المدينة، وأنا جنب. فانخنست منه» . وحقيقة اللفظ: اختفاء بعد ظهور. فليست لمجرد الاختفاء. ولهذا وصفت بها الكواكب في قوله تعالى: ٨١: ١٥ فَلا أُقْسِمُ بِالْخُنَّسِ قال قتادة: هي النجوم تبدو بالليل وتخنس بالنهار، فتختفي ولا ترى. وكذلك قال علي ﵁: هي الكواكب تخنس بالنهار فلا ترى.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies