Al-Ahkam al-SultaniyyahAl-Qadi Abu Ya’la Ibn al-Farra

He thus explicitly stated that the matter may be addressed by having whatever had spread from the tree removed, and that its owner should be ordered to do this rather than the official undertake it himself, because the claim is directed against the owner, who is responsible for keeping it within its proper bounds—just as the pledgor is called upon to sell the pledged property.

According to a report from Isḥāq ibn Hāniʾ, he said: “Regarding a man who has a tree in his house, from whose roots another tree has grown in the house of a different man: To whom does the tree belong?” He replied: “I do not know what this is. Perhaps it is harmful to the owner of the land.”

The apparent meaning of this is that if it causes no harm—that is, if its roots remain beneath the ground—he is not to be compelled to uproot it, since harm is what he took into consideration; and harm occurs only when the roots emerge above the surface of the ground.

Abū Ḥafṣ al-ʿUkbarī narrated through his chain of transmission from Abū Bakr ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, from Abū Bakr al-Khallāl, from Ḥarb, from ʿAmr ibn ʿUthmān, from Baqiyyah ibn al-Walīd, from Salamah al-Qurashī, from al-ʿAlāʾ ibn al-Ḥārith, from Makhūl, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “Whoever has a tree shading his house may choose either to eat its fruit or to cut away whatever part of it casts shade over his house.” This is understood to mean that the owner of the tree is the one who eats its fruit.

Abū Ḥafṣ also narrated through his chain of transmission from Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī, who said: “Samurah ibn Jundub had a date palm in the walled garden of a man from the Anṣār. He and his family used to enter upon the man, causing him distress. The Anṣārī complained about this to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), who said to him, ‘Sell it to him.’ He refused. He said, ‘Then uproot it.’ He refused. He said, ‘Give it to him, and you will have one like it in Paradise.’ He refused. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) then said, ‘You are causing harm. Go and uproot his palm tree.’” Thus, he ordered him to uproot it.

If the owner installs an oven in his house and the neighbor is disturbed by its smoke, or installs a millstone, or sets up blacksmiths or fullers there, is he to be prohibited from doing so?

فقد نص على أن له أخذه بإزالة ما انتشر منها وأنه يأمر صاحبه ولا يتولى هو ذلك بنفسه، لأن الحق توجه على المالك، وكان هو المطالب بإبقائه، كما يطلب الراهن ببيع الرهن. وقال في رواية إسحاق بن هانئ " في رجل في داره شجرة فنبتت من عروقها شجرة في دار رجل آخر: لمن الشجرة؟ فقال: ما أدري ما هذا؟ ربما كان ضررا على صاحب الأرض". وظاهر هذا أنه إذا لم يكن فيها ضرر، وهو أن تكون عروقها تحت الأرضن لا يؤخذ بقلعها لأنه اعتبر الضرر، والضرر إنما يكون بظهورها على وجه الأرض. وقد روى أبو حفص العكبري عن أبي بكر عبد العزيز عن أبي بكر الخلال عن حرب عن عمرو بن عثمان عن بقية بن الوليد عن سلمة القرشي عن العلاء بن الحرث عن مكحول قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ " من أظلت شجرة داره فهو بالخيار بين أكل ثمرها أو قطع ما أظل عليه منها". وهذا محمول على أن صاحب الشجرة يأكل الثمرة. وروى أبو حفص أيضا بإسناده عن محمد بن علي قال" كان لسمرة بن جندب نخل في حائط رجل من الأنصار، وكان يدخل عليه وأهله فيؤذيه، فشكا ذلك الأنصاري إلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ فقال له: بعه، فأبى، قال: فاقلعه، فأبى: قال: هبه ولك مثلها في الجنة، فأبى: فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ أنت مضار، اذهب فاقلع نخله". فقد أمره بقلعه. فإن نصب المالك تنورا في داره، فتأذى الجار بدخانه، أو نصب في داره رحا، أو وضع فيها حدادين أو قصارين، فهل يمنع من ذلك؟.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies