Al-Ahkam al-SultaniyyahAl-Qadi Abu Ya’la Ibn al-Farra

If they do any of these things, or any part thereof, this constitutes a breach of the covenant according to one of the two reports. In the narration of Abū al-Ḥārith, he said concerning a Christian who forcibly had intercourse with a Muslim woman: “He is to be killed; this is not what they were given a treaty for. If she consented to him, he is also to be killed, and she is subject to the ḥadd punishment.” In the narration of Ḥanbal, he said: “Anyone who says something containing an offensive allusion to the Lord—Exalted is He—is to be killed, whether he is a Muslim or a disbeliever.” In the narration of Abū Ṭālib, he said concerning a Jew who insulted the Prophet ﷺ: “He is to be killed. He has breached the covenant.” There is another report, however, which states: “The covenant is breached only by refusing to pay the jizya and to submit to the enforcement of our laws.” In the narration of Mūsā ibn ʿĪsā al-Mawṣilī, he said concerning a polytheist who falsely accused a Muslim of fornication: “He is to be beaten.”

Likewise, in the narration of al-Maymūnī, concerning a man from the People of the Book who falsely accused a Muslim slave of fornication and mistreated him, he said: “He is to be beaten as the judge deems appropriate.” The apparent meaning of this is that he did not deem a dhimmi to have breached the covenant by falsely accusing a Muslim, even though this causes harm to Muslims.

As for matters that cause neither harm to Muslims nor dishonor to Islam—such as openly practicing a reprehensible matter in Muslim territory; establishing synagogues and churches in Muslim territory; reciting from their books aloud; ringing bells; building higher than Muslims; publicly displaying wine and pigs; and failing to refrain from the forms of imitation of Muslims that they had been required to avoid in their clothing, mounts, kunyas, and hairstyles—is it a duty for them to refrain from these things, or are they merely recommended to do so? In the narration of Abū al-Ḥārith, he said: “The dhimmīs should be made to observe the forelocks and zunnār belts, thereby being humiliated.”

فإن فعلوا ذلك أو شيئاً منه، نقض العهد في إحدى الروايتين. قال في رواية أبي الحارث: في نصراني استكره مسلمة على نفسها " يقتل، ليس على هذا صولحوا، وإن طاوعته يقتل، وعليها الحد". وقال في رواية حنبل " كل من ذكر شيئا يعرض به بالرب ﷿ فعليه القتل، مسلما كان أو كافرا". وقال في رواية أبي طالب: في يهودي شتم النبي ﷺ " يقتل. قد نقض العهد". وفيه رواية أخرى " لا ينقض العهد إلا بالامتناع من بذل الجزية وجرى أحكامنا عليهم". وقال في رواية موسى بن عيسى الموصلي" في المشرك إذا قذف مسلما " يضرب". كذلك في رواية الميموني: في الرجل من أهل الكتاب يقذف العبد المسلم وينكل به " يضرب ما يرى الحاكم". وظاهر هذا: أنه لم يجعله ناقضا للعهد بقذف المسلم وإن كان ضرر على المسلمين. فأما ما ليس فيه ضرر على المسلمين، ولا غضاضة على الإسلام، مثل إظهار منكر في دار الإسلام، بإحداث البيع والكنائس في دار الإسلام، ورفع أصواتهم بكتبهم، والضرب بالنواقيس، وإطالة البنيان على المسلمين، وإظهار الخمر والخنزير، وترك ما أخذ عليهم تركه من التشبه بالمسلمين في ملبوسهم، ومركوبهم، وكناهم، وشعورهم، فهل ذلك واجب عليهم تركه، أم هو مستحب؟. فقال في رواية أبي الحارث " ينبغي أن يؤخذ أهل الذمة بالنواصي والزنانير، يذلون بذلك".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies