Al-ṢafadiyyahIbn Taimiya

They are all agreed—on the strength of the very proof they advance—that had the world been eternal, its Agent would necessarily entail His act. Yet the world entails temporal events, and for something that contains such events to issue from an Agent whose act accompanies Him by necessity is impossible. Should one imagine that He first necessitated the world and then introduced events into it, that too would be impossible, for it would require the occurrence of events without a newly arising cause—something we have already shown to be untenable.

Put differently: if the occurrence of events without a new cause were admissible, the world itself could have begun, and the claim that it must be eternal would fall to the ground. If, however, such occurrence is impossible, the assertion of the world’s eternity is likewise invalid, for temporal events cannot proceed from an eternal necessitating cause. Thus, on either assumption, the philosophers’ contention that the world is necessarily eternal collapses, and with it their proof for its pre-eternity.

The same reasoning applies here: if an infinite regress of events is impossible, the world must be originated; and if it is possible, every part of the world could be produced by a prior event, so the proof that any part of it is eternal is nullified and the claim of its necessary pre-eternity fails on both counts.

This line of argument establishes the origination of every component of the cosmos without requiring us to say that the Lord only became able or became acting after previously not being so. It accords with the creed of the Salaf and the leading imams: it negates neither the divine acts that subsist in Him nor His attributes, and it does not render Him inactive with respect to His acts or the attributes of perfection. It posits no event without a corresponding new cause, nor does it prefer one possibility over another without a determinant. Rather, it unites sound rational proofs—free of contradiction—with transmitted texts that endorse what reason affirms, demonstrating that the Lord has always been and will ever remain.

هم متفقون على ما قام عليه الدليل من أنه لو كان قديما لكان فاعله مستلزما لمفعوله لكن العالم مستلزم للحوادث وصدور الحوادث والمستلزم للحوادث عن الفاعل المستلزم لمفعوله محال وإذا قدر أنه اوجب العالم ثم أحدث فيه الحوادث كان ذلك أيضا ممتنعا لأنه يقتضي حدوث الحوادث بلا سبب حادث وذلك ممتنع كما تقدم وإن شئت قلت إن كان حدوث الحوادث بلا سبب حادث جائزا أمكن حدوث العالم وبطل القول بوجوب قدمه وإن كان ممتنعا بطل القول بقدمه لامتناع حدوث الحوادث عن الموجب الأزلي فبطل قول الفلاسفة بوجوب قدمه على التقديرين وبطلت حجتهم على قدمه وهذا كما تقول إن كان تسلسل الحوادث ممتنعا لزم حدوثه وإن كان ممكنا أمكن حدوث كل شيء منه بحادث قبله فبطلت الحجة الدالة على قدم شيء منه وبطل القول بوجوب ذلك على التقديرين وهذه الطريق فيها تقرير حدوث كل شيء من العالم من غير احتياج إلى جعل الرب قادرا بعد أن لم يكن أو فاعلا بعد أن لم يكن وهي موافقة لمذهب السلف والأئمة ليس فيها ابطال أفعال الله القائمة به ولا ابطال صفاته ولا تعطيله عن الأفعال وصفات الكمال ولا إثبات حادث بلا سبب حادث ولا ترجيح الممكن بلا مرجح فهي جامعة للأدلة العقلية السليمة عن المعارض والنصوص السمعية المزكية لما دل عليه العقل ومبينة أن الرب لم يزل ولا يزال

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies