Al-ṢafadiyyahIbn Taimiya

could not, they say, lay bare the truth—which, in fact, is what we proclaim—so they offered the people illustrative parables from which the masses might profit, all the while inwardly embracing the very doctrines espoused by the philosophers. Hence they contend that religious duties fall away from the spiritual elite, a claim echoed by certain Qarmaṭī Bāṭinite sectarians, philosophers, antinomian Sufis, and others. Their rationale is that the sole objective is knowledge and gnosis; once that goal is reached, worship, in their view, serves no further purpose.

They also allege that the Prophet—may God bless him and grant him peace—confided to a select circle of Companions teachings that accord with their own. Yet anyone acquainted with the life of our Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and with the state of his Companions knows, with absolute certainty, that such people contradict and slander him and are among the worst of hypocrites. The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, together with his closest Companions, were among the most devout of all people toward God, the most diligent in fulfilling obligatory acts and avoiding the prohibited. Those select Companions were also the foremost in affirming what he brought concerning God’s Names and Attributes, His angels, the Last Day, and all other matters he reported, and they were equally foremost in upholding what he brought of commands and prohibitions. Thus, what they concealed of knowledge and spiritual state fully matched what they displayed in word and deed; they harbored nothing that contradicted their outward practice, nor did they subscribe to the creed of the negators.

In fact, the doctrine of denying the divine Attributes only appeared in the ummah after the era of the Companions and the leading Successors had passed. During the lifetime of the Companions no one uttered any of the Jahmite, attribute-negating notions—let alone the even more extreme views of these atheists, for whom the denial of the Attributes is but a single aspect of their unbelief!

For this reason scholars have differed over the Jahmites: are they even to be counted among the seventy-two sects

ما كان يمكنهم إظهار الحق الذي هو قولنا فأظهرت للناس من التمثيلات ما ينتفعون به وكانت في الباطن تعتقد ما تعتقده الفلاسفة ولهذا يقولون إن الخواص تسقط عنهم العبادات كما يقول ذلك من يقوله من القرامطة الباطنية والفلاسفة وملاحدة المتصوفة وغيرهم قالوا لأن المقصود العلم والمعرفة فإذا حصل المقصود لم يبق في العبادة فائدة. ويقولون إن النبي صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كان يسر إلى خواص أصحابه ما يوافق قولهم ومن عرف حال نبينا صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وحال أصحابه معه علم بالاضطرار أن هؤلاء مخالفون له مناقضون مفترون عليه وأنهم من شرار المنافقين فإن النبي صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وخواص أصحابه كانوا من أعبد الناس لله وأعظمهم إتيانا بأداء الواجبات وترك المحرمات وكان خواص أصحابه من أعظم الناس تقريرا لما بعث به من الإخبار عن الله بأسمائه وصفاته وعن ملائكته وعن اليوم الآخر وغير ذلك من أخباره ومن أعظم الناس تقريرا لما بعث به من الأمر والنهي فكان ما يبطنونه من العلم والحال موافقا لما يظهرونه من القول والعمل ولم يكونوا يبطنون ما يناقض ظاهرهم ولا كانوا يعتقدون مذهب أهل النفي بل قول نفاة الصفات إنما حدث في الأمة بعد انقضاء عصر الصحابة وكبار التابعين وإلا فلم يكن احد يتكلم في زمن الصحابة بشيء من أقوال الجهمية نفاة الصفات فكيف بأقوال هؤلاء الملاحدة الذين نفى الصفات بعض إلحادهم؟! ولهذا تنازع الناس في الجهمية هل هم من الثنتين وسبعين فرقة

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies