Al-ṢafadiyyahIbn Taimiya

The earlier philosophers who affirmed that the universe is originated—even more, who affirmed the divine attributes and the voluntary acts that subsist in God—precede Aristotle. The first of the Peripatetic philosophers known to have claimed the eternity of the celestial spheres was Aristotle, yet the proofs he advanced are exceedingly feeble and cannot establish the point he desired. All he really did was argue for the eternity of time, saying that time is the measure of motion; from this he concluded that motion, too, must be eternal. He then assumed that the very genus of time is the measure of the motion of the heavens, and that is a grave error. For when one says, “Time is the measure of motion,” time in its genus is the measure of motion in general, not of any particular motion; a particular stretch of time is only the measure of a particular motion. Hence Muslims hold that the genus of time will remain after the Resurrection, the splitting of the heavens, and the rolling up of the sun. The people of Paradise will experience intervals of time that correspond to motions other than the motion of the celestial sphere; in the Hereafter they will have the “Day of Increase,” Friday, even though Paradise contains neither sun nor bitter cold, but rather other kinds of lights and motions.

Therefore, whoever says that the Lord has never ceased to speak whenever He wills, however He wills, and with whatever He wills, regards speech as an intrinsic attribute subsisting in the Essence of God. He speaks through His action, and His action proceeds from His will and power. If one says that the genus of that speech is eternal, this satisfies the proof that requires the eternity of that genus without entailing that anything in the creation is co-eternal with God, exalted is He. There is no need, then, to posit a first beginning for the possibility of the act, nor to combine two opposites by saying: “If an act—or a contingent event—must be preceded by non-existence, yet the possibility of it has no first moment.” Such a formulation unites contradictions, just as does the assertion that He has never ceased to be able while the object of His power cannot endure forever.

المتقدمون على القول بحدوثه بل وعلى إثبات الصفات والأمور الاختيارية القائمة بالله وأول من عرف عنه من الفلاسفة المشائين القول بقدم الأفلاك هو أرسطو وحججه على ذلك واهية جدا لا تدل على مطلوبه بل استدلاله على قدم الزمان وأنه مقدار الحركة فيلزم قدمها ثم ظن أن جنس الزمان مقدار حركة الفلك وهذا غلط عظيم فإن جنس الزمان إذا قيل الزمان مقدار الحركة فهو مقدار جنس للحركة لا حركة معينة بل الزمان المعين مقدار الحركة المعينة ولهذا كان جنس الزمان باقيا عند المسلمين بعد قيام القيامة وانشقاق السماء وتكوير الشمس ولأهل الجنة أزمنة هي مقادير حركات هناك غير حركة الفلك ولهم في الآخرة يوم المزيد يوم الجمعة مع أن الجنة ليس فيها شمس ولا زمهرير بل أنوار وحركات أخر. فمن قال: إن الرب لم يزل متكلما إذا شاء وكيف شاء وبما شاء كان الكلام عنده صفة ذات قائم بذات الله وهو يتكلم بفعله وفعله بمشيئته وقدرته فمقدار ذلك إذا قيل بقدمه كان وفاء بموجب الحجة المقتضية لقدم نوع ذلك من غير أن يكون شيء من العالم قديم مع الله تعالى ولا يحتاج مع ذلك أن يقال لإمكان الفعل بداية ولا أن يجمع بين النقيضين في التقدير فيقال إذا قيل الفعل أو الحادث بشرط كونه مسبوقا بالعدم لا أول لإمكانه فإن هذا التقدير جمع بين النقيضين كما في تقدير كونه لم يزل قادرا مع امتناع دوام المقدور.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies