Al-ṢafadiyyahIbn Taimiya

upon what arises from its fellow causes.

As for the Necessary-in-Himself, whom they style the First Cause and the First Principle, His effusion depends on nothing outside His own Essence, nor does He have a partner who can dispense with Him. On the contrary, everything other than Him proceeds from Him and is His handiwork; they themselves call it His effect, what He necessitates, and the like. It is therefore inadmissible to claim that the effusion of the Lord—exalted is He—awaits the occurrence of some event beyond Him, as they allow in the case of the Active Intellect according to their doctrine and the analogy they draw from it.

Muslims, however, recognize no real existence for an “Active Intellect.” Instead, they illustrate the matter with the sun: once it rises, its light and warmth are universally diffused, although their reception depends on the presence of suitable dispositions and capacities. Should a roof or a cloud block the influx of its light and heat, and the obstruction later disappear, the light and warmth reappear without any new act arising within the sun itself; the change is solely due to something that occurred outside it.

Second objection:
The Necessary-in-Himself, the Eternal, Lord of all worlds—whom they call the First Cause and the First Principle—must be either (1) a complete cause from pre-eternity in His own right, meaning that He Himself necessitates and brings forth effects, as they assert; or (2) His act of necessitation depends on something other than Himself.

If the first alternative is adopted, then all that He necessitates and produces must be concomitant with Him from pre-eternity, so all His effects would be eternal. Yet each particular event is not eternal; consequently none of them would be among His effects, and none of them would originate from Him, whether through an intermediary or otherwise. It would follow that these occurrences have no producer whatsoever, for there is no other eternal Necessary Being who could function as the origin and cause of events, directly or through any intermediary.

If, on the other hand, it is said that His necessitation depends on something outside Himself, He would no longer be a complete cause, and so

على ما يحدث عن مشاركيه وأما الواجب بنفسه الذي يسمونه العلة الأولى والمبدأ الأول فلا يتوقف فيضه على غير ذاته ولا له شريك غني عنه بل كل ما سواه صادر عنه ومفعول له وهم يسمونه معلولا له وموجبا له ونحو ذلك فلم يجز أن يكون فيض الرب تعالى موقوفا على حدوث حادث من غيره كما جاز مثل ذلك في العقل الفعال عندهم والتمثيل بالعقل الفعال على أصلهم. وأما المسلمون فلا حقيقة عندهم للعقل الفعال بل التمثيل يحصل بالشمس فإنها إذا ظهرت كان نورها وحرارتها عامة وإن توقف ذلك على حدوث استعدادات وقوابل فإذا كان هناك سقف أو سحاب يمنع فيض ضوئها وحرارتها ثم زال ذلك المانع حدث الضوء والحرارة بدون تجدد فعل في ذاتها وإنما هو لحدوث حادث في غيرها. الثاني: أن يقال الواجب بنفسه القديم رب العالمين الذي يسمونه العلة الأولى والمبدأ الأول إما أن يكون علة تامة في الأزل بنفسه أي مقتضيا وموجبا بنفسه كما يدعونه وإما أن يتوقف إيجابه على غيره فإن كان الأول لزم أن يقترن به جميع موجبه ومقتضاه في الأزل فيكون جميع معلولاته أزلية وكل واحد من الحوادث ليس أزليا فلا يكون شيء منها من معلولاته فلا يكون شيء منها حادث عنه لا بسوط ولا غيره فيلزم أن لا محدث لها بحال إذ ليس هناك واجب قديم غيره يكون مبدأ للحوادث وعلة لها بوسط أو بغير وسط. وإن قيل: يتوقف إيجابه على غيره لزم أن لا يكون علة تامة فلا

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies