Al-TadmuriyyaIbn Taimiya

Objection: You may argue, “The impossibility of negating both contradictories applies only to something that is capable of receiving either one of them. These two qualities stand in the relation of privation and possession, not pure affirmation and negation; for we do not describe a wall as blind or sighted, alive or dead, since it is incapable of either.”

Reply (first point): We answer, first, that this reasoning cannot be applied to existence and non-existence, for these two are opposites of affirmation and negation, as all rational people agree. Consequently, the removal of one necessarily entails the presence of the other.

As for what you mentioned concerning life and death, knowledge and ignorance, that is nothing more than a verbal convention coined by the Peripatetic philosophers, and terminological conventions are no proof against rational realities. Allah the Exalted says, “Those whom they invoke apart from Allah create nothing, while they themselves are created; they are dead, not living, and they do not perceive when they will be resurrected” (16:20–21). Thus He called

[اعتراض] فإن قلت: إنما يمتنع نفي النقيضين عما يكون قابلاً لهما، وهذان يتقابلان تقابل العدم والمَلَكَة، لا تقابل السلب والإيجاب، فإن الجدار لا يقال له: أعمى ولا بصير، ولا حي ولا ميت، إذ ليس بقابل لهما. [الرد عليه من وجوه: الوجه الأول] قيل لك: أولاً: هذا لا يصح في الوجود والعدم، فإنهما متقابلان تقابل السلب والإيجاب، باتفاق العقلاء، فيلزم من رفع أحدهما ثبوت الآخر. وأما ما ذكرته من الحياة والموت، والعلم والجهل، فهذا اصطلاح اصطلحت عليه المتفلسفة المشاءون، والاصطلاحات اللفظية ليست دليلا على نفي الحقائق العقلية، وقد قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَالَّذِينَ يَدْعُونَ مِن دُونِ اللَّهِ لاَ يَخْلُقُونَ شَيْئًا وَهُمْ يُخْلَقُونَ • أَمْواتٌ غَيْرُ أَحْيَاءٍ وَمَا يَشْعُرُونَ أَيَّانَ يُبْعَثُونَ﴾ فسمى

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies