Al-TadmuriyyaIbn Taimiya

valid unless the One so described were a body. Hence, if we affirm His exaltedness above creation, this would require that He be a body; and once we concede that, since all bodies are alike, anthropomorphism (tashbih) necessarily follows.

For this reason you will see them branding anyone who affirms divine exaltedness and similar attributes a mushabbih (anthropomorphist), while they do not apply that label to those who affirm hearing, sight, speech, and the like—exactly as the author of al-Irshad and others say.

Judge Abu Yaʿla and some other scholars who affirm both the attributes and exaltedness occasionally agree with them in claiming that all bodies are identical; however, they classify exaltedness as a “reported attribute” (sifah khabariyyah), which is the first of the two opinions transmitted from Abu Yaʿla, so that

يصح إلا إذا كان جسمًا، فلو أثبتنا علوه للزم أن يكون جسمًا، وحينئذ فالأجسام متماثلة فيلزم التشبيه. فلهذا تجد هؤلاء يسمُّون من أثبت العلو ونحوه مشبِّهًا، ولا يسمُّون من أثبت السمع والبصر والكلام ونحوه مشبِّهًا، كما يقوله صاحب «الإرشاد» وأمثاله. وكذلك قد يوافقهم على القول بتماثل الأجسام القاضي أبو يعلى وأمثاله من مثبتة الصفات والعلو، لكن هؤلاء قد يجعلون العلو صفة خبرية، كما هو أول قولي القاضي أبى يعلى، فيكون

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies