“Maʿālim al-Tanzīl” by al-Baghawī, hadith documentation.
“Muʿjam al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī,” selected and compiled.
It is a collection of hadith excerpts that the shaykh gathered—together with their isnāds—from hundreds of manuscripts preserved in the Ẓāhiriyyah Library in Damascus, the Islamic Awqāf Library in Aleppo, the Maḥmūdiyyah Library at the Prophet’s Mosque, the ʿĀrif Ḥikmat Library in Medina, and other repositories.
He arranged the material in alphabetical order.
The work is of tremendous benefit and now exceeds forty volumes.
See his description in the introduction to Ṣaḥīḥ al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr (p. 17).
“Al-Mughnī ʿan Ḥaml al-Asfār fī al-Asfār” by al-ʿIrāqī, copied and annotated.
This was among the first projects the shaykh undertook, while still under twenty: he transcribed al-ʿIrāqī’s work and supplied useful marginal notes—part commentary, part correction (1).
See: ʿUlamāʾ wa-Mufakkirūn by al-Majdhūb 1/291–292).
“Manāsik al-Ḥajj wa-l-ʿUmrah fī al-Kitāb wa-l-Sunnah wa-Āthār al-Salaf, Together with a Survey of the Innovations People Have Added to Them,” authored (printed).
It is an abridgement of his earlier book Ḥijjat al-Nabī ﷺ, with additional material not found in the original.
“Al-Munāẓarāt wa-l-Rudūd,” authored.
It contains a number of his debates, including:
His exchanges with the self-styled Mahdī, with Jamil Lewis the Christian, and others.
“The Debate between Shaykh al-Albānī and Shaykh al-Zamzamī,” transcribed by ʿAbd al-Ṣamad al-Biqālī.
So reported in al-Aṣālah, which adds: “It is a manuscript.”
I would add: the debate took place between the two shaykhs—al-Albānī and Muḥammad al-Zamzamī ibn al-Ṣiddīq al-Ghumārī—in Tangier, Morocco, during the month of Ramaḍān, 1396 AH.
The person who actually wrote up the debate was al-Zamzamī himself, and he published it under the title “A Debate between the Scholar al-Zamzamī and the Contradictory al-Albānī.”
Accordingly, attributing this book to al-Albānī is incorrect, and I fear that what is meant here is a copy that al-Albānī wrote in his own hand; Allah knows best.
It is stated in al-Aṣālah: