Bidāyat al-MujtahidIbn Rushd

The source of their disagreement lies in the ambiguity found in the Prophet’s ﷺ words:
“Fast when you sight it and break the fast when you sight it; but if it is obscured from you, fa-qdurū lahu.”

The majority understood the phrase fa-qdurū lahu to mean: “complete the number to thirty (days).” Others held that “estimate for it” means to calculate it by astronomical reckoning, while a third group maintained that its meaning is to begin the day fasting—­the opinion of Ibn ʿUmar, as noted earlier, though the wording hardly supports it.

The majority adopted their reading because of the sound ḥadīth reported from Ibn ʿAbbās in which the Prophet ﷺ said:
“If it is obscured from you, then complete the number to thirty.”

The former text is ambiguous, whereas this one is explicit; hence the ambiguous must be interpreted in light of the explicit. This is an undisputed principle among the legal theorists, for in their view an ambiguous text and its clarifying counterpart never truly conflict. The position of the majority is therefore evident—­and Allah knows best.

As for their divergence regarding the time of sighting: they agree that if the crescent is seen at dusk, the month is deemed to begin on the following day. They differ, however, when the first sighting occurs at any other time during daylight—­that is, the very first moment it is observed.

The majority hold that a crescent first seen in the daytime counts for the coming day, exactly as if it had been seen at dusk. This is the view of Mālik, al-Shāfiʿī, Abū Ḥanīfah, and the bulk of their disciples.

Abū Yūsuf (of Abū Ḥanīfah’s school), al-Thawrī, and Ibn Ḥabīb (of Mālik’s school) said: if the crescent is sighted before noon it belongs to the preceding night; if it is sighted after noon it belongs to the night to come.

The cause of their disagreement is their failure to rely on empirical observation in a matter whose proper avenue is experiment, and their recourse instead to transmitted reports—­while no Prophetic report exists on the point. Only two reports from ʿUmar—may Allah be pleased with him—have come down to us, one general and the other explicit; some scholars followed the general wording, others the explicit.

  1. The general report: al-Aʿmash narrated from Abū Wāʾil Shaqīq ibn Salamah who said, “A letter from ʿUmar reached us while we were in Khāniqīn stating: ‘The crescents differ in size. If you see the crescent during the day, do not break the fast until two men testify that they saw it the previous evening.’”

  2. The explicit report: al-Thawrī related that news reached ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb that some people saw the crescent after noon and broke their fast. He wrote rebuking them and said, “If you see the crescent during the day before noon, break the fast; but if you see it after noon, do not break the fast.”

The Qāḍī comments: Analogy and experience both indicate that the moon cannot be seen while the sun has not yet set except

وَسَبَبُ اخْتِلَافِهِمُ: الْإِجْمَالُ الَّذِي فِي قَوْلِهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ -: «صُومُوا لِرُؤْيَتِهِ وَأَفْطِرُوا لِرُؤْيَتِهِ فَإِنْ غُمَّ عَلَيْكُمْ فَاقْدُرُوا لَهُ» . فَذَهَبَ الْجُمْهُورُ إِلَى أَنَّ تَأْوِيلَهُ أَكْمِلُوا الْعِدَّةَ ثَلَاثِينَ. وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ رَأَى أَنَّ مَعْنَى التَّقْدِيرِ لَهُ هُوَ عَدُّهُ بِالْحِسَابِ. وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ رَأَى أَنَّ مَعْنَى ذَلِكَ أَنْ يُصْبِحَ الْمَرْءُ صَائِمًا، وَهُوَ مَذْهَبُ ابْنِ عُمَرَ - كَمَا ذَكَرْنَا - وَفِيهِ بُعْدٌ فِي اللَّفْظِ. وَإِنَّمَا صَارَ الْجُمْهُورُ إِلَى هَذَا التَّأْوِيلِ لِحَدِيثِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ الثَّابِتِ أَنَّهُ قَالَ - عَلَيْهِ الصَّلَاةُ وَالسَّلَامُ -: «فَإِنْ غُمَّ عَلَيْكُمْ فَأَكْمِلُوا الْعِدَّةَ ثَلَاثِينَ» وَذَلِكَ مُجْمَلٌ وَهَذَا مُفَسَّرٌ، فَوَجَبَ أَنْ يُحْمَلَ الْمُجْمَلُ عَلَى الْمُفَسَّرِ، وَهِيَ طَرِيقَةٌ لَا خِلَافَ فِيهَا بَيْنَ الْأُصُولِيِّينَ، فَإِنَّهُمْ لَيْسَ عِنْدَهُمْ بَيْنَ الْمُجْمَلِ وَالْمُفَسَّرِ تَعَارُضٌ أَصْلًا، فَمَذْهَبُ الْجُمْهُورِ فِي هَذَا لَائِحٌ - وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ. وَأَمَّا اخْتِلَافُهُمْ فِي اعْتِبَارِ وَقْتِ الرُّؤْيَةِ: فَإِنَّهُمُ اتَّفَقُوا عَلَى أَنَّهُ إِذَا رُئِيَ مِنَ الْعَشِيِّ أَنَّ الشَّهْرَ مِنَ الْيَوْمِ الثَّانِي، وَاخْتَلَفُوا إِذَا رُئِيَ فِي سَائِرِ أَوْقَاتِ النَّهَارِ - أَعْنِي: أَوَّلَ مَا رُئِيَ - فَمَذْهَبُ الْجُمْهُورِ أَنَّ الْقَمَرَ فِي أَوَّلِ وَقْتٍ رُئِيَ مِنَ النَّهَارِ أَنَّهُ لِلْيَوْمِ الْمُسْتَقْبَلِ كَحُكْمِ رُؤْيَتِهِ بِالْعَشِيِّ، وَبِهَذَا الْقَوْلِ قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالشَّافِعِيُّ وَأَبُو حَنِيفَةَ وَجُمْهُورُ أَصْحَابِهِمْ. وَقَالَ أَبُو يُوسُفَ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ وَالثَّوْرِيُّ وَابْنُ حَبِيبٍ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ مَالِكٍ: إِذَا رُئِيَ الْهِلَالُ قَبْلَ الزَّوَالِ فَهُوَ لِلَّيْلَةِ الْمَاضِيَةِ وَإِنْ رُئِيَ بَعْدَ الزَّوَالِ فَهُوَ لِلْآتِيَةِ. وَسَبَبُ اخْتِلَافِهِمْ: تَرْكُ اعْتِبَارِ التَّجْرِبَةِ فِيمَا سَبِيلُهُ التَّجْرِبَةُ وَالرُّجُوعُ إِلَى الْأَخْبَارِ فِي ذَلِكَ، وَلَيْسَ فِي ذَلِكَ أَثَرٌ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ - عَلَيْهِ الصَّلَاةُ وَالسَّلَامُ - يُرْجَعُ إِلَيْهِ، لَكِنْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عُمَرَ - رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ - أَثَرَانِ: أَحَدُهُمَا عَامٌّ، وَالْآخَرُ مُفَسِّرٌ، فَذَهَبَ قَوْمٌ إِلَى الْعَامِّ وَذَهَبَ قَوْمٌ إِلَى الْمُفَسِّرِ. فَأَمَّا الْعَامُّ: فَمَا رَوَاهُ الْأَعْمَشُ عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ شَقِيقِ بْنِ سَلَمَةَ قَالَ: أَتَانَا كِتَابُ عُمَرَ وَنَحْنُ بِخَانِقِينَ أَنَّ الْأَهِلَّةَ بَعْضَهَا أَكْبَرُ مِنْ بَعْضٍ، فَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمُ الْهِلَالَ نَهَارًا فَلَا تُفْطِرُوا حَتَّى يَشْهَدَ رَجُلَانِ أَنَّهُمَا رَأَيَاهُ بِالْأَمْسِ. وَأَمَّا الْخَاصُّ: فَمَا رَوَى الثَّوْرِيُّ عَنْهُ أَنَّهُ بَلَغَ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ أَنَّ قَوْمًا رَأَوُا الْهِلَالَ بَعْدَ الزَّوَالِ فَأَفْطَرُوا، فَكَتَبَ إِلَيْهِمْ يَلُومُهُمْ وَقَالَ: إِذَا رَأَيْتُمُ الْهِلَالَ نَهَارًا قَبْلَ الزَّوَالِ فَأَفْطِرُوا، وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمُوهُ بَعْدَ الزَّوَالِ فَلَا تُفْطِرُوا. قَالَ الْقَاضِي: الَّذِي يَقْتَضِي الْقِيَاسَ وَالتَّجْرِبَةَ أَنَّ الْقَمَرَ لَا يُرَى وَالشَّمْسُ بَعْدُ لَمْ تَغِبْ إِلَّا

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies