Al-Muqaddimāt al-MumahhidātIbn Rush al-Jadd

by judicial ruling. Had he called witnesses when digging it to testify that he was digging it solely for himself, he should not be prevented from selling its water, and he should acquire ownership of it through reclamation, under the rules governing the reclamation of unowned, uncultivated land. In al-Mudawwana, Mālik said, “I disapprove of selling water from a livestock well,” whereas in al-Majmūʿa he said, “That is not permissible.” It has been said that these statements do not differ in meaning. The correct explanation is that the ruling depends on whether he dug it as an act of charity or otherwise. Allah knows best.

Section

The order of priority in drinking from a livestock well, when those entitled to the well, travellers passing through, and other people gather with their livestock, and there is enough water for them all, is as follows: those entitled to the water first take enough for themselves to quench their thirst; then the passing travellers do likewise. Next, the beasts of burden belonging to those entitled to the water drink their fill, followed by those of the passing travellers. Then the livestock belonging to those entitled to the water drink their fill, and the surplus is available for everyone else’s livestock. Ashhab, however, gave travellers’ beasts of burden priority over those belonging to the people entitled to the water.

Section

If, however, there is no surplus water, and giving one group priority would cause hardship to the other, priority in drinking and watering their beasts of burden is given to whichever group would suffer greater hardship if the other went first. If the hardship would be equal, they are treated equally. This is Ashhab’s position. According to Ibn Lubāba’s view, however, if the hardship would be equal, those entitled to the water have the stronger claim to priority for themselves and their beasts of burden.

But if the water becomes very scarce, or giving some priority over others would put the latter at risk of death, those entitled to the water go first, taking enough for themselves to avert that danger. If any water remains, the travellers take enough for themselves to avert that danger. If any still remains, those entitled to the water take enough for their beasts of burden to avert that danger. Then, if

بالحكم؛ ولو أشهد عند حفره إياها أنه إنما يحفرها لنفسه، لوجب ألا يمنع من بيع مائها، وأن يستحقها ملكا بالإحياء على حكم إحياء الموات؛ قال في المدونة: أكره بيع ماء بئر الماشية، وقال في المجموعة لا يجوز ذلك؛ فقيل إنه لا اختلاف من القول، والصحيح أن ذلك إنما يعود إلى الفرق بين أن يحفرها على وجه الصدقة، أو على غير وجه الصدقة- والله أعلم. فصل ووجه التبدئة في الشرب في بئر الماشية إذا اجتمع أهل البئر والمارة وسائر الناس بمواشيهم والماء يقوم بهم: أن يبدأ أولا أهل الماء فيأخذوا لأنفسهم حتى يرووا، ثم المارة حتى يرووا، ثم دواب أهل الماء حتى يرووا، ثم دواب المارة حتى يرووا، ثم مواشي أهل الماء حتى يرووا، ثم الفضل لسائر مواشي الناس. وبدأ أشهب دواب المسافرين قبل دواب أهل الماء. فصل فأما إن لم يكن في الماء فضل وتبدئة أحدهم يجهد الآخر فإنه يبدأ بأنفسهم ودوابهم من كان الجهد عليه أكثر بتبدئة صاحبه، فإن استووا في الجهد تساووا، هذا مذهب أشهب، وعلى ما ذهب إليه ابن لبابة أنهم إذا استووا في الجهد، فأهل الماء أحق بالتبدئة لأنفسهم ودوابهم؛ وأما إن قل الماء جرا أو خيف على بعضهم بتبدئة بعض- الهلاك فإنه يبدأ أهل الماء فيأخذون لأنفسهم ما يذهب عنهم الخوف فإن فضل فضل أخذ المسافرون لأنفسهم بقدر ما يذهب الخوف عنهم؛ فإن فضل فضل، أخذ أهل الماء لدوابهم بقدر ما يذهب الخوف عنهم؛ فإن

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies