Al-Muqaddimāt al-MumahhidātIbn Rush al-Jadd

he is eternal or has come into being? Through correct reflection, I come to know that he is eternal. Thus, knowledge that the one who brought me into being is eternal is inferential knowledge founded upon the knowledge that I have one who brought me into being, which is itself inferential knowledge. This rests upon knowledge that I have come into being, which is also inferential knowledge, and that rests upon knowledge of my existence, which is necessary knowledge.

Section

Inferential knowledge is attained following reflection. It shares with necessary knowledge the quality of knowing a thing as it truly is. It is therefore permissible to testify to what is known through reflection and inference, just as it is permissible to testify to what is known necessarily. An example is the report that Khuzaymah ibn Thābit testified on behalf of the Prophet, peace be upon him, that he had purchased the horse from the Bedouin, although Khuzaymah had neither been present nor witnessed it. Another example is the report that Abū Hurayrah testified that a man had vomited wine. Umar asked him, “Do you testify that he drank it?” He replied, “I testify that he vomited it.” Umar ibn al-Khattāb said to him, “What is this excessive scrupulousness? No, by your Lord, he did not vomit it without having drunk it!”

Other examples include the testimony of experts concerning whether defects are longstanding or recent, and the testimony of knowledgeable persons concerning whether harm is longstanding or recent. Of the same kind is the testimony that Muhammad’s community, on the Day of Resurrection, will give on behalf of the prophets against their peoples, affirming that they conveyed the message. May Allah bless Muhammad and grant him peace. This is too clear to require explanation, for every believer testifies that Allah alone has no partner and that He lives, knows, has power, wills, hears, sees, and speaks—among His other attributes—because he knows this. Yet he has no way of knowing any of these things except through reflection and inference.

Section

Likewise, it is permissible to testify to what is known through mass-transmitted reports, such as clientage, lineage, death, a judge’s appointment or dismissal, harm between spouses, and similar matters. It is valid

هو قديم أو محدث؟ فأعلم بالنظر الصحيح أنه قديم؛ فالعلم بأن محدثي قديم علم نظري مبني على العلم بأن لي محدثا الذي هو علم نظري، وهو مبني على العلم بحدثي، الذي هو أيضا علم نظري، وهو مبني على العلم بوجودي وهو ضرورة. فصل فالعلم النظري يقع العلم به عقيب النظر، ويستوي مع الضروري في أنه معرفة المعلوم على ما هو به، فالشهادة بما علم من جهة النظر والاستدلال جائزة، كما تجوز بما علم من جهة الضرورة، وذلك مثل ما روي أن خزيمة بن ثابت شهد للنبي ﵇ أنه اشترى الفرس من الأعرابي ولم يحضر ولا شهد؛ ومثل ما روي أن أبا هريرة شهد أن رجلا قاء خمرا، فقال له عمر: أتشهد أنه شربها؟ فقال: أشهد أنه قاءها، فقال له عمر بن الخطاب: ما هذا التعمق؟ فلا وربك ما قاءها حتى شربها؛ ومن ذلك: شهادة الحكماء في قدم العيوب وحدوثها، وشهادة أهل المعرفة في قدم الضرر وحدوثه؛ ومن هذا المعنى شهادة أمة محمد ﷺ يوم القيامة للنبيين على أممهم بالبلاغ، وهذا بين من أن يحتاج إلى تبيانه؛ لأن كل مؤمن فإنما يشهد أن الله وحده لا شريك له وأنه حي، عالم، قادر، مريد، سميع، بصير، متكلم- إلى غير ذلك من الصفات التي هو عليها- لعلمه بذلك، ولا طريق له إلى العلم بشيء من ذلك إلا من جهة النظر والاستدلال. فصل وكذلك الشهادة أيضا بما علم من جهة الأخبار المتواترة جائزة كالولاء والنسب والموت، وولاية القاضي وعزله، وضرر الزوجين، وما أشبه ذلك؛ يصح

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies