Al-Muqaddimāt al-MumahhidātIbn Rush al-Jadd

Section
On Litigation

The foundation for adjudicating claims in the Book of Allah, Almighty and Majestic, is His statement:

“Whoever invokes another god alongside Allah, for whom he has no proof, his reckoning is only with his Lord. Indeed, the disbelievers will not succeed.” [al-Mu’minūn: 117]

And His statement:

“Is there a god alongside Allah? Say, ‘Bring your proof, if you are truthful.’” [al-Naml: 64]

And His statement:

“Those who accuse chaste women and then fail to produce four witnesses—flog them with eighty lashes, and never accept their testimony thereafter. It is they who are defiantly disobedient.” [al-Nūr: 4]

These verses establish that anyone who advances an assertion and introduces a doctrine must produce evidence establishing the truth of his assertion and proof establishing the soundness of his doctrine. Likewise, anyone who brings a claim against another concerning property, bloodshed, honour, or anything else must produce evidence supporting his claim. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, explained this in his general statement: “The burden of proof rests upon the claimant, and the oath upon the one who denies.” He also said to the man who brought a land dispute before him, alleging that the other party had seized the land during the pre-Islamic period, which the other party denied: “Your two witnesses, or his oath.”

Section

The way to determine how to adjudicate between two litigants is to distinguish the claimant, who is required to produce evidence supporting his claim and is not permitted to swear an oath, from the defendant, who is permitted to swear an oath and is not required to produce evidence. This is done by identifying the underlying reason that distinguishes them and requires that the defendant, rather than the claimant, be called upon first to swear an oath. For the claimant’s statement may be accepted when he is effectively in the position of the defendant, while the defendant may be required to produce evidence when he is effectively in the position of

فصل في التداعي الأصل في التداعي من كتاب الله ﷿ قَوْله تَعَالَى: ﴿وَمَنْ يَدْعُ مَعَ اللَّهِ إِلَهًا آخَرَ لا بُرْهَانَ لَهُ بِهِ فَإِنَّمَا حِسَابُهُ عِنْدَ رَبِّهِ إِنَّهُ لا يُفْلِحُ الْكَافِرُونَ﴾ [المؤمنون: ١١٧]، وقَوْله تَعَالَى: ﴿أَإِلَهٌ مَعَ اللَّهِ قُلْ هَاتُوا بُرْهَانَكُمْ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ صَادِقِينَ﴾ [النمل: ٦٤]، وقَوْله تَعَالَى: ﴿وَالَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَأْتُوا بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَاءَ فَاجْلِدُوهُمْ ثَمَانِينَ جَلْدَةً وَلا تَقْبَلُوا لَهُمْ شَهَادَةً أَبَدًا وَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ﴾ [النور: ٤]؛ فوجب بهذا على كل من ابتدأ قولا وابتدع مذهبا أن يأتي بالدليل على صدق قوله، والبرهان على صحة مذهبه، وعلى من ادعى على أحد دعوى في مال أو دم أو عرض أو غير ذلك، أن يأتي بالبينة على دعواه، وقد بين ذلك النبي ﷺ بعموم قوله: «البينة على المدعي واليمين على من أنكر». وبقوله للرجل الذي خاصم إليه في الأرض التي زعم أنه انتزى عليها في الجاهلية فأنكر ذلك من دعواه: «شاهداك أو يمينه». فصل فوجه معرفة الفصل في الحكم بين المتداعيين تمييز المدعي الذي يكلف إقامة البينة على دعواه ولا يمكن من اليمين من المدعى عليه الذي يمكن من اليمين ولا يكلف إقامة البينة بالوقوف على العلة المفرقة بينهما الموجبة لتبدئة المدعى عليه باليمين دون المدعي، إذ قد يكون القول قول المدعي إذا كان في معنى المدعى عليه وتكون على المدعى عليه إقامة البينة إذا كان في معنى

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies