Al-Muqaddimāt al-MumahhidātIbn Rush al-Jadd

Section

The “chaste women” intended in this verse are free, chaste women. The protected status that makes an accusation of adultery punishable by the prescribed punishment is that conferred by freedom and Islam—the same status that entails one hundred lashes for unlawful sexual intercourse. The words of Allah Most High, “chaste women” [Al-Nūr: 4], encompass both men and women. Since a woman cannot commit adultery except with a man, Allah, Mighty and Majestic, mentioned chaste women without separately mentioning chaste men. This is unanimously agreed upon: no Muslim disputes that accusing a chaste man is like accusing a chaste woman in incurring both the prescribed punishment and sin.

Section

This reasoning indicates that someone who accuses a group incurs only one prescribed punishment. Whoever accuses a chaste woman also accuses the man who allegedly committed adultery with her, yet Allah Most High has prescribed only one punishment for him. Moreover, He says, “Those who accuse chaste women” [Al-Nūr: 4], referring to women in the plural. The scholars have differed on this issue, holding three opinions:

The first is the position of Mālik and those who agree with him: the accuser incurs one prescribed punishment, whether he accuses them in a single utterance or separately on different occasions. This is also the position of Abū Hanīfah. Its evidence is what we have already stated, and none of Mālik’s followers disagrees on this point. According to Mālik and his followers, if a man accuses a group and receives the prescribed punishment on behalf of one of them, that punishment covers every accusation he made beforehand, whether or not the others have brought their claims. The exception is al-Mughīrah, who says that if they bring their claims separately, he receives a prescribed punishment for each of them. Ibn Shaʿbān related from some of our scholars that someone who says to a Companion, “You son of two adulterers,” when his mother is a free Muslim woman, is to receive two prescribed punishments, out of respect for the Companion’s inviolability.

The second is al-Shāfiʿī’s position: the accuser incurs the prescribed punishment for each individual, whether he accuses them in a single utterance or separately on different occasions. [The third is Ibn Abī Laylā’s position, which distinguishes between accusing them in a single utterance or on

فصل والمراد بالمحصنات في هذه الآية الحرائر العفيفات. والإحصان الذي يوجب الحد في القذف هو الإحصان بالحرية والإسلام الذي يوجب جلد مائة في الزنى ويدخل تحت قَوْله تَعَالَى: ﴿الْمُحْصَنَاتِ﴾ [النور: ٤] الرجال والنساء، لأنه لما كانت لا تزني امرأة إلا برجل اكتفى الله ﷿ بذكر المحصنات عن المحصنين، وهو أمر متفق عليه، لا اختلاف عند أحد من المسلمين أن قذف المحصن كقذف المحصنة في وجوب الحد ولحوق الإثم. فصل وهذا المعنى يدل على أن قاذف الجماعة حدا واحدا، لأن قاذف المحصنة قاذف للذي زنى بها ولم يوجب الله تعالى عليه إلا حدا واحدا مع قوله أيضا: ﴿وَالَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ﴾ [النور: ٤] وهن جماعة. وهذا موضع اختلف أهل العلم فيه على ثلاثة أقوال: أحدها: قول مالك ومن قال بقوله إن عليه حدا واحدا، قذفهم في كلمة واحدة أو مفترقين في مجالس شتى، وهو مذهب أبي حنيفة. والدليل على ذلك ما قلناه، ولا اختلاف في هذا بين أحد من أصحاب مالك. فإذا قذف الرجل جماعة فحد لأحدهم فذلك الحد لكل قذف تقدم قام طالبوه أو لم يقوموا عند مالك وأصحابه، حاشى المغيرة فإنه يقول إن طالبوه مفترقين حد لكل واحد منهم. وحكى ابن شعبان عن بعض أصحابنا لصاحب يا بن الزانيين وأمه حرة مسلمة حد حدين لحرمة الصحابي. والثاني: قول الشافعي إن عليه الحد لكل واحد منهم، قذفهم في كلمة واحدة أو مفترقين في مجالس شتى. [والثالث قول ابن أبي ليلى التفرقة بين أن يقذفهم في كلمة واحدة أو في

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies