Al-Muqaddimāt al-MumahhidātIbn Rush al-Jadd

offenders possessing ihsān, or apply generally to both categories, one of the two verses must abrogate the other: either the first is abrogated by the second, or the second by the first. Whichever abrogates the other is then itself abrogated either by His words, exalted is He:

“The woman and the man who commit unlawful sexual intercourse—flog each of them with one hundred lashes.” [al-Nūr: 2]

This is according to those who consider the two verses to concern offenders possessing ihsān. Alternatively, it is abrogated by the verse prescribing flogging together with the ruling of stoning revealed by Allah, according to those who consider the two verses to apply generally to both categories.

It has been said that the second verse abrogates the first. Ismāʿīl al-Qādī, however, held that the first in the order of recitation abrogates the second. In the earliest days of Islam, the two offenders were yuhnasān, confined, and testified against; this ruling was then abrogated by His words:

“Confine them to their houses until death takes them or Allah makes a way for them.” [al-Nisā’: 15]

This interpretation is unlikely, since an abrogating text must come after the text it abrogates. The order of recitation indicates that the second verse came after the first, because the pronoun in His words in the second verse:

“The two among you who commit it” [al-Nisā’: 16]

refers back to the sexual immorality mentioned in the first verse. A pronoun cannot refer back to something not yet mentioned. Nevertheless, this interpretation is supported by the report that, when the verse prescribing flogging was revealed—His words:

“The woman and the man who commit unlawful sexual intercourse—flog each of them with one hundred lashes” [al-Nūr: 2]—

the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said:

“Take this from me: Allah has now made a way for them. For a virgin with a virgin: one hundred lashes and banishment for a year. For a non-virgin with a non-virgin: one hundred lashes and stoning.”

Section

Thus, stoning came from Allah, Mighty and Majestic, in one of two ways:

Either through a text revealed to the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, namely: “The old man and the old woman—stone them both without fail.” This was recited as revelation, but it was not Quran. Had it been Quran, it would necessarily have been either unabrogated or abrogated. It cannot have been unabrogated, for then it would have been preserved between the two covers, and its omission could not have occurred, since Allah Most High has preserved the Quran. He says:

“Indeed, it is We who sent down the Reminder, and indeed, We will preserve it.” [al-Hijr: 9]

الزانيين المحصنين أو عامة في الصنفين فلا بد أن تكون إحداهما ناسخة لصاحبتها، إما الأولى بالثانية، وإما الثانية بالأولى. ثم الناسخة منهما لصاحبتها منسوخة إما بقوله تعالى: ﴿الزَّانِيَةُ وَالزَّانِي فَاجْلِدُوا كُلَّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا مِائَةَ جَلْدَةٍ﴾ [النور: ٢] على مذهب من رأى أنهما في الزانيين المحصنين، أو بآية الجلد وما أنزل الله من الحكم بالرجم على مذهب من رأى أن الآيتين عامتان في الصنفين، فقيل: إن الثانية هي الناسخة للأولى. وقال إسماعيل القاضي: إن الأولى في التلاوة هي الناسخة للثانية، وذلك أن الزانيين في صدر الإسلام كانا يحنصان ويحبسان ويشهدان فنسخت بقوله: ﴿فَأَمْسِكُوهُنَّ فِي الْبُيُوتِ حَتَّى يَتَوَفَّاهُنَّ الْمَوْتُ أَوْ يَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ لَهُنَّ سَبِيلا﴾ [النساء: ١٥] وهذا بعيد لأن من حق الناسخ أن يكون واردا بعد المنسوخ، والتلاوة تدل أن الثانية وردت بعد الأولى، لأن الهاء من قوله فيها: ﴿وَاللَّذَانِ يَأْتِيَانِهَا مِنْكُمْ﴾ [النساء: ١٦] عائدة على الفاحشة المذكورة في الآية الأولى. ولا يصح أن تكون هاء الكناية عائدة على ما لم يذكر بعد إلا أنه يؤيده ما روي «أن رسول الله ﷺ قال لما نزلت آية الجلد قوله: ﴿الزَّانِيَةُ وَالزَّانِي فَاجْلِدُوا كُلَّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا مِائَةَ جَلْدَةٍ﴾ [النور: ٢] خذوا عني قد جعل الله لهن سبيلا، البكر بالبكر جلد مائة وتغريب عام. والثيب بالثيب جلد مائة والرجم». فصل فكان الرجم من عند الله ﷿ بأحد وجهين: إما بنص أوحي به إلى النبي ﷺ وهو قوله: الشيخ والشيخة فارجموهما البتة فكان يتلى على أنه وحي ولم يكن قرآنا، إذ لو كان قرآنا لم يخل أن يكون محكما أو منسوخا، ولا يصح أن يكون محكما إذ لو كان محكما لثبت بين اللوحين ولما صح سقوطه، لأن الله تعالى قد حفظ القرآن فقال: ﴿إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ﴾ [الحجر: ٩].

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies