Al-Muqaddimāt al-MumahhidātIbn Rush al-Jadd

his slave to a particular person or give him to that person: he may revoke the authorization by any words or actions he chooses, so long as the agent has not carried out his instructions.

Section

Neither al-Shāfiʿī nor those who follow his position have any proof for revoking tadbīr and permitting the sale of a slave pledged to manumission upon his master’s death in Jābir’s report that the Prophet, peace be upon him, “sold a slave pledged to manumission upon his master’s death.” This merely recounts an action. It is possible that the tadbīr was conditional, or that the master had incurred a debt before making the pledge, and the Prophet sold the slave to settle that debt. Since the hadith admits these possibilities, they are not entitled to apply it to the disputed case; we would be equally entitled to apply it to a case on which we agree.

Section

If they say, “Hadiths are transmitted only to convey useful information. If this hadith were applied to a case on which there is agreement, it would convey nothing new, since that case is already established by consensus. Applying it to the disputed case, however, would yield new information,” we answer: This is an arbitrary assertion. Reports may convey new information, but they may also confirm what is already known. Perhaps this hadith is itself the revealed ruling upon which the consensus known to us was based. That being so, when the hadith admits both interpretations, it cannot, without evidence, be applied to a case that yields new information rather than to one already known through consensus.

They could validly appeal to the hadith only if its wording were general—for example, if he had said, “Selling a slave pledged to manumission upon his master’s death is permissible.” It would then have to be understood as applying generally to all cases unless evidence restricted its scope. But since its wording is not general and it merely recounts an action, they cannot do so.

Section

Further evidence supporting our interpretation—that this report, which gives no details, concerns a case in which both we and they permit the sale of such a slave—is that the hadith has also been transmitted with an explanation. Al-Aʿmash narrated it from Salama ibn Kuhayl, from Jābir, who said: “A man of the Ansār pledged a Coptic slave of his named Madhkūr to manumission upon his death. He was in need and had a debt, so the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, sold the slave for one hundred

عبده من فلان أو يهبن له أنَّ له أنْ يرجع عن ذلك بما شاء من قول أو فعل ما لم ينفذ الوكيل أمره. فصل ولا حجة للشافعي ومن ذهب مذهبه في إبطال التدبير وإجازة بيع المدبر فيما رواه جابر عن النبي ﷺ «أنه باع مدبرا» لأنه إنما هو حكاية فعل، فيحتمل أن يكون تدبيره مقيدا، ويحتمل أن يكون كان عليه دين قبل التدبير فباعه عليه في الدين. وإذا احتمل الحديث هذه الاحتمالات لم يكن لهم أن يحملوه على موضع الخلاف وإلا ولنا حمله على موضع الوفاق. فصل فإن قالوا: الأحاديث إنما تنقل للفائدة فلو حمل الحديث على الوفاق لم تكن فيه فائدة لأن موضع الوفاق مستفاد بالإجماع ففي حمله على موضع الخلاف فائدة مجردة قيل لهم: هذا تحكم، لأنه قد ينقل ما يفيد كما ينقل ما يؤكد ما قد استفيد، ولعل هذا الحديث هو الشرع الذي صدر عنه الإجماع الذي قد استفدنا معرفته. وإذا كان الأمر على ذلك فلا يصح أن يحمل على ما يستفاد منه فائدة مجردة دون ما استفدناه بالإجماع مع احتماله للموضعين بغير دلالة. وإنما كان يصح لهم التعلق بالحديث لو كان لفظا عاما مثل أن يقول: بيع المدبر جائز لحق حمله على عمومه في جميع المواضع حتى يأتي ما يخصه. وأما وليس بلفظ عام وإنما هو حكاية فعل فلا. فصل ومما يدل على صحة ما ذهبنا إليه من حمل هذا الحديث الذي ورد مجملا على موضع يجوز فيه بيع المدبر عندنا وعندهم أنه قد روي هذا الحديث مفسرا، فرواه الأعمش عن سلمة بن كهيل «عن جابر قال: أعتق رجل من الأنصار عبدا له عن دبر يسمى مذكورا قبطيا وكان محتاجا وعليه دين فباعه رسول الله ﷺ بمائة

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies