Al-Muqaddimāt al-MumahhidātIbn Rush al-Jadd

The second is that pre-emption applies between co-owners only to divisible real property, not to indivisible property.

The third is that pre-emption applies between co-owners only to residential and landed property, not to other goods. Allah grants success.

As for the first point—that pre-emption applies only between co-owners, and that a neighbour has no right of pre-emption, even if he is jadīd to him with respect to the property, unless he holds an undivided share in it—three aspects of the hadith provide evidence for it:

The first is its explicit wording.

The second is its contrary implication.

The third is its apparent meaning and general scope.

Its explicit wording is his statement:

“Once boundaries have been established and access routes assigned, there is no pre-emption.”

As for its contrary implication, he made pre-emption conditional upon the absence of partition, saying, “Pre-emption applies to property that has not been divided among its co-owners.” This indicates that pre-emption ceases once partition takes place. This is clear.

As for its apparent meaning and general scope, he said, “Pre-emption applies to property that has not been divided.” Since the expression “pre-emption” is general and encompasses every instance of pre-emption, he confined pre-emption as a whole to undivided property. Thus, no right of pre-emption remains in property that has been divided. This is the position of Mālik, may Allah have mercy on him, al-Shāfiʿī and their followers: a neighbour has no right of pre-emption.

Abū Hanīfah, however, affirmed the right of pre-emption for an immediately adjoining neighbour, provided no through road separates the two properties, and for a non-adjoining neighbour if they share a dead-end road. According to them, the person with the strongest entitlement to pre-emption is the co-owner whose share has not been partitioned; next comes the co-owner whose share has been partitioned but who retains a shared right in the road; then comes the non-adjoining neighbour who shares a dead-end road.

Their evidence is the report that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: “The neighbour

والثاني: أن الشفعة إنما تكون بين الشركاء فيما ينقسم من الأصول دون ما لا ينقسم. والثالث: أن الشفعة إنما تكون بين الشركاء في الرباع والأصول دون سائر العروض وبالله التوفيق. فأما الوجه الأول، وهو أن الشفعة إنما تكون بين الشركاء وأن لا شفعة للجار وإن كان جديدا له في المال إذا لم يشاركه فيه على الإشاعة فيستدل عليه بثلاثة أوجه من الحديث: أحدها: نص الكلام. والثاني: دليل الخطاب. والثالث: الظاهر والعموم. فأما النص فهو قوله «فإذا وقعت الحدود وصرفت الطرق فلا شفعة». وأما دليل الخطاب فهو أنه لما علق الشفعة بعدم القسمة فقال الشفعة فيما لم ينقسم بين الشركاء دل على انتفائها مع وجودها وهذا بين. وأما الظاهر والعموم فإنه لما قال الشفعة فيما لم يقسم، والشفعة من ألفاظ العموم المستغرقة للشفعة كان قد جعل جنس الشفعة فيما لم يقسم فلم يبق فيما قد قسم شفعة. وهذا قول مالك ﵀ والشافعي وأصحابهما أنه لا شفعة للجار. وأثبت أبو حنيفة للجار المصاقب الشفعة ما لم يكن بينها طريق نافذة، ولغير المصاقب إذا اشتركا في طريق غير نافذة. فأولى الناس بالشفعة عندهم الشريك الذي لم يقاسم، ثم الشريك المقاسم إذا بقيت له في الطريق شركة، ثم الجار الذي ليس بمصاقب إذا كان شريكا في طريق غير نافذة. وحجتهم ما روي عن رسول الله ﷺ أنه قال: «الجار

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies