vaginally. This indicates that, during menstruation, He prohibited only what He explicitly permitted after they become pure: vaginal intercourse, and nothing else. It is also said that they asked him about this because they used to avoid vaginal intercourse with women during menstruation and have anal intercourse with them instead. When they asked the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, about this, Allah Most High revealed:
“They ask you about menstruation. Say, ‘It is a source of discomfort.’” [al-Baqarah: 222]
Continuing through to His words:
“Approach them from where Allah has commanded you.” [al-Baqarah: 222]
That is, in the vagina; do not go beyond it. This interpretation is more evident than the first and clearer in meaning.
Section
The Differing Views on the Avoidance Commanded in the Verse
Scholars hold three views concerning how women are to be avoided during menstruation, as commanded in the verse.
The first is that a man must avoid touching any part of her body with any part of his own, according to the apparent meaning of the words of Allah, Mighty and Majestic. For He commanded avoiding them in general terms, without distinguishing one part of their bodies from another. This view was adopted only by those who followed the apparent meaning of the Quran without knowing the reports transmitted from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on this matter.
The second is that physical contact with the parts of her body above the waist-wrapper is permissible, in accordance with the transmitted reports. This is the position of the majority of jurists in the various regions. It is also the position of Mālik and the majority of his followers, both the earlier scholars and the later scholars of Baghdād.
The third is that every form of intimacy with her is permissible except vaginal intercourse, according to the apparent meaning of the report from ‘Ā’ishah—may Allah Most High be pleased with her—that she said to someone who asked her about this: “Every form of intimacy with her is lawful for you, except vaginal intercourse.” Asbagh adopted this view, saying: “She was commanded to fasten her waist-wrapper around herself only so that none of her blood would get on him when he lay beside her.” He regarded the reported prohibition of physical contact beneath the waist-wrapper as a safeguard against the means leading to the forbidden, lest he have vaginal intercourse with her.