Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

being devoid of all other accidents. Al-Ka‘bī and his followers said: ‘They may be devoid of spatial states, but cannot be devoid of colors.’”

He said:

“All who disagree with us nevertheless agree that substances cannot be devoid of accidents once they have received them. The argument against the atheists is therefore framed in terms of spatial states, since what we assert concerning them rests on self-evident knowledge. By the immediate intuition of reason, we know that substances capable of coming together and separating cannot be conceived as neither touching nor separate.

“This is further clarified by the following: if they come together at some future time, their coming together necessarily presupposes an earlier separation, provided that they are assumed to have existed before coming together. Likewise, if separation occurs, we necessarily know that it was preceded by their being together. Our purpose in seeking to establish the world’s temporal origination becomes clear through these spatial states.”

الخلو عما عداها، وقال الكعبي ومتبعوه: يجوز الخلو عن الأكوان، ويمتنع العرو عن الألوان) . قال: (وكل مخالف لنا يوافقنا على امتناع العرو عن الأعراض بعد قبول الجواهر لها، فيفرض الكلام على الملحدة في الأكوان، فإن القول فيها يستند إلى الضرورة، فإننا ببديهة العقل نعلم أن الجواهر القابلة للاجتماع والافتراق لا تعقل غير متماسة ولا متباينة. ومما يوضح ذلك: أنها إذا اجتمعت فيما لا يزال فلا يتقرر اجتماعها إلا عن افتراق سابق، إذا قدر لها الوجود قبل الاجتماع، وكذلك إذا طرأ الافتراق عليها اضطررنا إلا العلم بأن الافتراق مسبوق باجتماع، وغرضنا في ورم إثبات حدث العالم، يتضح بالأكوان) ,.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies