Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

On this basis, the difficulty is resolved: the creation of the heavens and the earth can only be fully established through what revelation has brought. The world’s coming into existence cannot be affirmed on the premises of those who deny divine acts. They claim that reason has demonstrated the negation of these acts, and give what they regard as a rational proof precedence over what the Quran and Sunnah have brought. Yet, upon careful examination, reason invalidates this position and agrees with revelation.

For once it becomes clear that denying these acts makes it impossible to affirm that anything comes into existence—whether the world or anything else—while things are visibly coming into existence, reason has demonstrated the truth of what revelation has brought concerning this matter. Allah, glorified is He, possesses attributes of perfection and is free of deficiencies. Every perfection attributed to a created being that entails no deficiency is more fittingly attributed to the Creator; and every deficiency from which a created being is deemed free is something from which the Creator is even more deserving of being deemed free. Acting is an attribute of perfection, not deficiency, just as speech and power are. The absence of action is a deficiency, just as the absence of speech and power is. Thus, reason demonstrates the truth of what revelation indicates, which is what was to be established.

Before Abū Muhammad ibn Kullāb, people fell into two groups. The people of the Sunnah and the community affirmed the attributes that subsist in Allah Most High, together with the acts that He wills and has the power to perform. The Jahmiyyah, including the Mu‘tazilah and others, denied both. Ibn Kullāb affirmed that abiding attributes subsist in Him, but denied that acts or anything else connected with His will and power subsist in Him.

Abū al-‘Abbās al-Qalānisī, Abū al-Hasan al-Ashharī, and others agreed with him on this. As for al-Hārith al-Muhāsibī, he adhered to Ibn Kullāb’s position; for this reason, Ahmad ordered that he be shunned. Ahmad used to warn against Ibn Kullāb and his followers. It was later said of al-Hārith that he had recanted his position.

وعلى هذا فيزول الإشكال ويكون إثبات خلق السماوات والأرض إنما يتم بما جاء به الشرع، ولا يمكن القول بحدوث العالم على أصل نفاة الأفعال الذين يزعمون أن العقل قد دل على نفيها، ويقدمون هذا الذي هو عندهم دليل عقلي على ما جاء به الكتاب والسنة، والعقل عند التحقيق يبطل هذا القول ويوافق الشرع، فإنه إذا تبين أن القول بنفيها يمتنع معه القول بحدوث شيء من الحوادث: لا العالم ولا غيره، والحوادث مشهودة، كان العقل قد دل على صحة ما جاء به الشرع في ذلك، والله سبحانه موصوف بصفات الكمال، منزه عن النقائص، وكل كمال وصف به المخلوق من غير استلزامه لنقص فالخالق أحق به، وكل نقص نزه عنه المخلوق فالخالق أحق بأن ينزه عنه، والفعل صفة كمال لا صفة نقص، كالكلام والقدرة، وعدم الفعل صفة نقص، كعدم الكلام وعدم القدرة، فدل العقل على صحة ما دل عليه الشرع، وهو المطلوب. وكان الناس قبل أبي محمد بن كلاب صنفين، فأهل السنة والجماعة يثبتون ما يقوم بالله تعالى من الصفات والأفعال التي يشاؤها ويقدر عليها، والجهمية من المعتزلة وغيرهم تنكر هذا وهذا، فأثبت ابن كلاب قيام الصفات اللازمة به، ونفى أن يقوم به ما يتعلق بمشيئته وقدرته من الأفعال وغيرها. ووافقه على ذلك أبو العباس القلانسي، وأبو الحسن الأشهري وغيرهما، وأما الحارث المحاسبي فكان ينتسب إلى قول ابن كلاب، ولهذا أمر أحمد بهجره، وكان أحمد يحذر عن ابن كلاب وأتباعه، ثم قيل عن الحارث: إنه رجع عن قوله.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies