Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

As for those who say:

“He has always spoken whenever He wills, or acted according to His will, and will or successive utterances subsist in Him, one after another,”

they never regard Him as a complete cause or a fully necessitating cause from eternity. Nor do they say that His agency in producing any effect is complete from eternity.

Rather, in their view, to say that something is produced and fashioned yet beginningless is to combine two contradictory propositions. If a produced thing—the effect of the One who brings it into being—cannot be beginningless, then the causal activity and bringing into being that necessarily entail it cannot be eternal and beginningless either. It is therefore impossible for Him to be the complete cause of anything from eternity.

Rather, through the acts that subsist in Him, His essence necessarily entails one thing after another. Whenever His agency in producing an effect becomes complete, that effect comes into existence—that effect comes into existence. As Allah Most High says:

“When He wills a thing, His command is only to say to it, ‘Be,’ and it is.”

(Yā Sīn: 82)

Thus, whenever He brings a thing into being, He brings it into being, and the thing brought into being follows His bringing it into being. This is always the case. Everything other than Him is therefore created, coming into being after not having existed. His bringing it into being and creating it were not complete from eternity; rather, they became complete thereafter. Upon the completion of this bringing into being and creation, the thing brought into being and created came to exist after that bringing into being and creation, not simultaneously with them in time. How far removed, then, is this view from yours?!

وأما الذين يقولون: (إنه لم يزل متكلماً إذا شاء، أو فاعلاً بمشيئته، وإنه يقوم به إرادة أو كلمات متعاقبة شيئاً بعد شيء) فهؤلاء لا يجعلونه في الأزل قط علة تامة، ولا موجباً تاماً، ولا يقولون: إن فاعلية شيء من المفعولات يتم في الأزل. بل عندهم كون الشيء مفعولاً ومصنوعاً مع كونه أزلياً جمع بين النقيضين، وإذا امتنع كون المفعول الذي هو أثر المكون أزلياً، امتنع كون تأثيره وتكوينه المستلزم له قديماً أزلياً، فأمتنع أن يكون علة تامة في الأزل لشيء من الأشياء. ولكن ذاته تستلزم بما يقوم بها من الأفعال شيئاً بعد شيء، وكلما تم فاعلية مفعول وجد ذلك المفعول وجد ذلك المفعول، كما قال تعالى: {إنما أمره إذا أراد شيئا أن يقول له كن فيكون} (يس: ٨٢) ، فكلما كون الشيء كونه فحصل المكون عقب تكوينه، وهكذا الأمر دائماً، فكل ما سواه مخلوق حادث بعد أن لم يكن، وتمام تكوينه وتخليقه لم يكن موجوداً في الأزل، بل إنما تم تخليقه وتكوينه بعدئذ، وعند تمام التكوين والتخليق حصل المكون المخلوق عقب التكوين والتخليق، لا مع ذلك في الزمان، فأين هذا القول من قولكم؟ ‍!.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies