Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

As for the majority of rational people among humankind, they said:

“This contradicts what is known through sensory perception.”

For the sake of this argument, groups of speculative theologians, among the Mu'tazilah and others, committed themselves to denying the Lord’s attributes altogether, or to denying some of them. For them, what indicates that these things are temporally originated is that attributes inhere in them, and an argument must be applied consistently. They therefore committed themselves to asserting that anything possessing an attribute that inheres in it is temporally originated. This, too, is utterly unsound and misguided. On account of this argument, they committed themselves to asserting that the Quran is created and to denying that Allah will be seen in the Hereafter and that He is exalted above His Throne, along with similar consequences accepted by those who consistently applied the premises of this argument, which the Mu'tazilah and their followers made the foundation of their religion.

These matters fall within what such people call the foundations of religion, but they are not, in reality, among the foundations of the religion that Allah has ordained for His servants.

As for the religion concerning which Allah says:

“Or do they have partners who have ordained for them a religion that Allah has not authorized?”

Al-Shūrā: 21

It has foundations and subsidiary matters of its own.

Once it is understood that the expression “the foundations of religion,” as used by those who employ it, contains ambiguity and vagueness because its meanings vary according to linguistic conventions and technical usage, it becomes clear that what constitutes the foundations of religion in the sight of Allah, His Messenger, and His believing servants has been inherited from the Messenger.

As for anyone who institutes a religion that Allah has not authorized, it is clear that the principles from which that religion necessarily follows cannot have been transmitted from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. For it is false, and whatever entails falsehood is itself false,

وأما جمهور عقلاء بني آدم فقالوا: هذه مخالفة للمعلوم بالحس. والتزم طوائف من أهل الكلام من المعتزلة وغيرهم لأجلها نفي صفات الرب مطلقاً، أو نفي بعضها، لأن الدال عندهم علي حدوث هذه الأشياء هو قيام الصفات بها، والدليل يجب طرده، فالتزموا حدوث كل موصوف بصفة قائمة به، وهو أيضاً في غاية الفساد والضلال، ولهذه التزموا القول بخلق القرآن، وإنكار رؤية الله في الآخرة، وعلوه علي عرشه، إلي أمثال ذلك من اللوازم التي التزمها من طرد مقدمات هذه الحجة التي جعلها المعتزلة ومن اتبعهم أصل دينهم. فهذه داخلة فيما سماه هؤلاء أصول الدين، ولكن ليست في الحقيقة من أصول الدين الذي شرعه الله لعباده. وأما الدين الذي قال الله فيه: {أم لهم شركاء شرعوا لهم من الدين ما لم يأذن به الله} الشوري: ٢١ فذاك له أصول وفروع بحسبه. وإذا عرف أن مسمي أصول الدين في عرف الناطقين بهذا الاسم فيه أجمال وإبهام لما فيه من الاشتراك بحسب الأوضاع والاصطلاحات، تبين أن الذي هو عند الله ورسوله وعباده المؤمنين أصول الدين فهو موروث عن الرسول. وأما من شرع دينا لم يأذن به الله فمعلوم أن أصول المستلزمة له لا يجوز أن تكون منقولة عن النبي صلي الله عليه وسلم، إذ هو باطل، وملزوم الباطل باطل،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies