Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

which consists in recognizing His lordship and acknowledging His oneness. Neither disbelief nor faith results from this; rather, these arise in them subsequently in accordance with the prevailing decree. He created everyone upon the innate disposition and commanded everyone to believe, so that the call would be valid and the sincere counsel universal. He enabled everyone to do what He commanded and willed).

[Ibn Taymiyyah’s Commentary]

I say:

These words agree with the view of those who say that He created them upon the innate disposition, which consists in recognizing and acknowledging the Creator, and that this alone does not make a person either a believer or a disbeliever. The author has rejected the view that they were created upon disbelief or faith, which is the apparent meaning of the position previously related from a group of scholars.

The author of these words holds that the recognition and acknowledgment upon which they were created cannot be changed. This agrees with the view that the words, “There is no change in Allah’s creation,” constitute a statement of fact. However, the proponent of that interpretation holds that people are created only upon the innate disposition: creation is not altered such that they are created otherwise.

The author of these words, by contrast, holds that creation cannot be altered afterward. That is, they cannot cease to recognize and acknowledge the Creator; rather, this recognition and acknowledgment are inseparable from them. He holds that a person cannot depart from anything upon which he was created. He affirms divine decree and that Allah creates people’s deeds, yet denies that they were innately disposed to those deeds, forced into them, or compelled to perform them.

As for the discussion of compulsion, it is treated at length elsewhere. We have explained that the position of the leading scholars, such as al-Awzā‘ī, al-Thawrī, Ahmad ibn Hanbal and others, is to reject both the affirmation and the negation of compulsion.

The position of al-Zubaydī and a group of scholars is to deny compulsion

وهي معرفة ربوبيته، والإقرار بوحدانيته، لا يقع بذلك كفر ولا إيمان، بل ذلك عليهم طارىء بالحكم الجاري، فخلق الكل على الفطرة، وأمر الكل بالإيمان، لصحة الدعوة، وعموم النصيحة، وأقدر الكل على ما أمر وأراد) . [تعليق ابن تيمية] قلت: فهذا الكلام يوافق قول من قال: خلقهم على الفطرة، التي هي المعرفة والإقرار بالصانع، وأن ذلك لا يصير به العبد مؤمناً ولا كافراً، وقد أبطل من يقول: إنهم خلقوا على الكفر والإيمان، وهو ظاهر القول الذي تقدم عن طائفة من العلماء. وصاحب هذا الكلام يقول: الذي خلقوا عليه من المعرفة والإقرار لا يمكن تغييره. وهذا موافق لقول من قال: لا تبديل لخلق الله - إنها بمعنى الخبر. لكن ذاك يقول: إنهم لا يخلقون إلا على الفطرة، لا يبدل الخلق، فيخلقون على غير ذلك. وصاحب هذا الكلام يقول: لايبدل الخلق بعد ذلك، أي: لا يمكن أن يصيروا غير عارفين مقرين بالخلق، بل هذه المعرفة والإقرار أمر لازم لهم، وهو يقول: كل ما خلق عليه العبد فلا يمكن انتقاله عنه، وهو يثبت القدر، وأن الله خالق أفعال العباد، وينكر أن يكونوا جبلوا على ذلك واضطروا إليه أو جبروا عليه. فأما الكلام في الجبر فهو مبسوط في غير هذا الموضع، وقد بينا أن مذهب الأئمة، كالأوزاعي والثوري وأحمد بن حنبل وغيرهم، أنهم ينكرون إثبات الجبر ونفيه معاً. ومذهب الزبيدي وطائفة: نفي الجبر

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies