Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

He went on to say:

“We have seen people remain in disbelief for a time and then believe, and others who were believers and then disbelieved. Had this been part of their innate constitution, they would not have changed. But because it was acquired, change and transition were possible. Allah Most High says:

“How would Allah guide a people who disbelieved after having believed?”

He thus truly attributed it to them. He also says:

“That is because they believed, then disbelieved.”

“Why was there no town that believed and benefited from its faith, except the people of Jonah? When they believed…”

Do you not see that their faith benefited them because they had not been created as disbelievers by their very constitution? Yet when Pharaoh said, ‘I believe,’ it did not benefit him.

The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, provided a satisfying and convincing answer in the hadith in which he said:

‘Every child is born upon the natural disposition; then his parents make him a Jew, a Christian, or a Magian.’

The Muslims unanimously agree that a disbeliever is not punished and flogged for the way he was created; rather, he is punished and flogged for his intention and what he has acquired through his actions. This is where they prefer what He forbade them over the faith He commanded them to embrace. Thus, His declaring them liars was on account of something they had acquired, a deed they had done, a prohibition they had violated, and a command they had disobeyed. It was something they themselves brought about, not something innate in them, imposed upon them, or ingrained in their nature at creation. For had He created them as disbelievers, they would have been compelled to be so, and no Muslim has maintained this.

Do you not see that when He created them with knowledge, no alternative to it was possible for them or occurred, nor were they rewarded for it? I mean knowledge of His lordship, which is the natural disposition. Yet we find that it is possible to move from disbelief to

إلى أن قال: (وقد رأينا على الكفر برهة ثم آمن، ومن كان مؤمناً ثم كفر. ولو كان ذلك صبغةً لما انتقلوا، ولما كان من الكسب صح عليه النقلة والتحويل، وقد قال تعالى: {كيف يهدي الله قوما كفروا بعد إيمانهم} ، فأضافه إليهم حقيقة. وقال: {ذلك بأنهم آمنوا ثم كفروا} ، {فلولا كانت قرية آمنت فنفعها إيمانها إلا قوم يونس لما آمنوا} ، ألا ترى أنهم لما لم يخلقوا صبغة كفاراً نفعهم إيمانهم؟. ولما قال فرعون (آمنت) لم ينفعه. وقد أشفى في الحديث بما فيه مقنع بقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم: «ما من مولود إلا وهو يولد على الفطرة، فأبواه يهودانه وينصرانه ويمجسانه» ، وهو إجماع المسلمين أن الكافر لا يعاقب ويجلد على ما خلق، إنما يعاقب ويجلد على نيته وكسبه، وهو موضع إيثارهم لما نهاهم عنه، على ما أمرهم به من الإيمان، فكان تكذيبه لهم على كسب اكتسبوه، وفعل فعلوه، ونهي ارتكبوه، وأمر خالفوه، وهو ما أحدثوه، لا شيء جبلوا عليه ولا اضطروا له، ولا خلقوا مجبولين عليه، إذ لو خلقهم كفاراً لكانوا إلى ذلك مضطرين، ولم يقل بذلك أحد من المسلمين. ألاترى أنه لما خلقهم علىمعرفة لم يصح لهم ولم يقع غير ذلك، ولم يثابوا على ذلك؟ أعني: معرفة الربوبية، وهي الفطرة، ووجدنا الكفر يصح النقل عنه إلى

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies