Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

Then He said:

“Or lest you say, ‘Our forefathers associated others with Allah before us, and we were descendants who came after them. Will You then destroy us for what those who followed falsehood did?’”

He mentioned two arguments they might advance, both of which this testimony refutes. The first is:

“Lest you say on the Day of Resurrection, ‘We were unaware of this.’”

He thus explained that this is innate, necessary knowledge that every human being must possess. This establishes Allah’s proof refuting denial of the Creator: affirming the Maker is innate, necessary knowledge, and constitutes proof against such denial.

The second is:

“Or lest you say, ‘Our forefathers associated others with Allah before us, and we were descendants who came after them.’”

This is a proof refuting polytheism, just as the first is a proof refuting denial of the Creator. Denial of the Creator is exemplified by the disbelief of Pharaoh and those like him, while polytheism is exemplified by the association of others with Allah among all nations.

As for His words:

“Or lest you say, ‘Our forefathers associated others with Allah before us, and we were descendants who came after them. Will You then destroy us for what those who followed falsehood did?’”

They mean: those who followed falsehood were our polytheist forefathers—will You punish us for the sins of others?

This supposes that they did not know that Allah was their Lord, that they found their forefathers associating others with Him, and that they were descendants who came after them. The ordinary course of human nature is for a man to follow his father’s example, even in trades, dwellings, clothing, and food, since it was his father who raised him. That is why his parents make him a Jew, a Christian, a Magian, or a polytheist. If this were the natural pattern, and there were nothing in their innate disposition or reason that contradicted it, they would say:

“We are excused; our forefathers were the ones who

ثم قال: {أو تقولوا إنما أشرك آباؤنا من قبل وكنا ذرية من بعدهم أفتهلكنا بما فعل المبطلون} ، ذكر لهم حجتين يدفعهما هذا الإشهاد. إحداهما: {أن تقولوا يوم القيامة إنا كنا عن هذا غافلين} . فبين أن هذا علم فطري ضروري، لا بد لكل بشر من معرفته، وذلك يتضمن حجة الله في إبطال التعطيل، وأن القول بإثبات الصانع علم فطري ضروري، وهو حجة على نفي التعطيل. والثاني: {أو تقولوا إنما أشرك آباؤنا من قبل وكنا ذرية من بعدهم} ، فهذا حجة لدفع الشرك، كما أن الأول حجة لدفع التعطيل. فالتعطيل مثل كفر فرعون ونحوه، والشرك مثل شرك المشركين من جميع الأمم. وقوله: {أو تقولوا إنما أشرك آباؤنا من قبل وكنا ذرية من بعدهم أفتهلكنا بما فعل المبطلون} : وهم آباؤنا المشركون، وتعاقبنا بذنوب غيرنا؟ وذلك لأنه قدر أنهم لم يكونوا عارفين بأن الله ربهم، ووجدوا آباءهم مشركين، وهم ذرية من بعدهم، ومقتضى الطبيعة العادية أن يحتذى الرجل حذو أبيه حتى في الصناعات والمساكن والملابس والمطاعم، إذ كان هو الذي رباه، ولهذا كان أبواه يهودانه وينصرانه ويمجسانه ويشركانه، فإذا كان هذا مقتضى العادة الطبيعية، ولم يكن في فطرتهم وعقولهم ما يناقض ذلك، قالوا: نحن معذورون، وآباؤنا هم الذين

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies