Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

And that is what He refers to in His words: ‘The people of the right and the people of the left.’

Then He took the covenant from them, saying:

‘Am I not your Lord?’ They said, ‘Yes.’

One group obeyed Him willingly, while another did so reluctantly, as a means of self-protection. Then He and the angels said:

‘We bear witness, lest you say on the Day of Resurrection, “We were unaware of this,” * or say, “It was only our forefathers who associated partners with Allah before us.”’

Thus, there is no descendant of Adam who does not know Allah as his Lord. This is what He, Almighty and Majestic, refers to in His words:

‘To Him has submitted whoever is in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly.’

And in His words:

‘To Allah belongs the conclusive argument. Had He willed, He would have guided you all.’

This means the day He took the covenant.”

If this report is true, it indicates that every descendant of Adam knows Allah. If, then, they were born from this drop of semen, they were born with that knowledge. However, it also states that some acknowledged Him reluctantly despite possessing that knowledge, like someone who recognizes another person’s right but acknowledges it only under compulsion. This does not undermine the innate character of that knowledge. Nevertheless, this has reached us only through this report, and a report of this kind cannot be relied upon.

For this is found in works such as al-Suddī’s Quran commentary, which contains accounts some of which are known to be false. Although al-Suddī himself was trustworthy, these accounts would, at best, be comparable to reports with disconnected chains of transmission—if they were taken from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. What, then, if they include material taken from the People of the Book, who frequently tell lies? Indeed, these accounts are known to contain much that is demonstrably false, not

فذلك قوله: وأصحاب اليمين وأصحاب الشمال. ثم أخذ منهم الميثاق فقال: {ألست بربكم قالوا بلى} . فأطاعه طائفة طائعين وطائفة كارهين، على وجه التقية. فقال هو والملائكة: {شهدنا أن تقولوا يوم القيامة إنا كنا عن هذا غافلين * أو تقولوا إنما أشرك آباؤنا من قبل} ، فليس أحد من ولد آدم إلا وهو يعرف الله أنه ربه. وذلك قوله عز وجل: {وله أسلم من في السماوات والأرض طوعا وكرها} ، وذلك قوله: {فلله الحجة البالغة فلو شاء لهداكم أجمعين} يعني يوم أخذ الميثاق. فهذا الأثر إن كان حقاً ففيه أن كل ولد آدم يعرف الله، فإذا كانوا ولدوا على هذه النطفة فقد ولدوا على المعرفة، ولكن فيه أن بعضهم أقر كارهاً مع المعرفة، بمنزلة الذي يعرف الحق لغيره ولا يقر به إلا مكرهاً، وهذا لا يقدح في كون المعرفة فطرية، مع أن هذا لم يبلغنا إلا في هذا الأثر، ومثل هذا لا يوثق به. فإن هذا في مثل تفسير السدي، وفيه أشياء قد عرف بطلان بعضها، إذ كان السدي - وإن كان ثقة في نفسه - فهذه الأشياء أحسن أحوالها أن تكون كالمراسيل، إن كانت أخذت عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، فكيف إذا كان فيها ما هو مأخوذ عن أهل الكتاب الذين يكذبون كثيراً؟ وقد عرف أن فيها شيئاً كثيراً مما يعلم أنه باطل، لا

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies