Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

at all. Rather, none is beginningless except Him, glorified is He. He alone is the Creator of everything besides Him, and everything besides Him is created, as Allah Most High says:

“Allah is the Creator of all things.”

When these men debated the Jahmī and Muʿtazilī theologians, and those who agreed with their foundational argument that bodies—or the world—must have originated because a beginningless succession of events is impossible, they recognized that this proposition was false.

For this reason, leading speculative theologians, such as al-Rāzī and others, agree with them that it is unsound. Although al-Rāzī argues in his theological works, such as al-Arbaʿīn, Nihāyat al-ʿUqūl, and others, that a beginningless succession of events is impossible—as his argument and his fellow theologians’ objections to it have already been presented—he himself criticizes these proofs in other works. He argues that perpetual activity is necessary, that events cannot occur without a cause, and that they cannot occur outside time. He also answers every argument advanced in those theological works, as he does in al-Mabāhith al-Mashriqiyyah and elsewhere.

Perhaps those who criticized these proofs of his—such as al-Āmidī, al-Abharī, al-Urmawī, the author of Lubāb al-Arbaʿīn, and others—took these criticisms, or some of them, from his own writings, or drew them from the same sources as he did.

I have seen this for myself: I would come across these men’s objections to him, or some of his replies, then later consult another work of his and find that they had taken this

البتة، بل لا قديم إلا هو سبحانه، وهو وحده الخالق لكل ماسواه، وكل ما سواه مخلوق، كما قال تعالى: {الله خالق كل شيء} . وهؤلاء لمما كانت مناظرتهم مع المتكلمين الجهمية والمعتزلة، ومن وافقهم على أصلهم في الاستدلال على حدوث الأجسام، أو حدوث العالم، بامتناع حوادث لا أول لها، ورأى هؤلاء أن هذه قضية كاذبة. ولهذا كان أئمة أهل الكلام، كـ الرازي وغيره، يوفقونهم على فسادها، فإن الرازي وإن قرر في كتبه الكلامية كـ الأربعين ونهاية العقول وغيرهما: امتناع حوادث لا أول لها، كما تقدم تقريره، واعتراض إخوانه عليه، فهو نفسه في كتب أخرى يقدح في هذه الأدلة، ويقرر وجوب دوام الفاعلية، وامتناع حدوث الحوادث بلا سبب، وامتناع حدوثها في غير زمان، ويجيب عن كل ما يحتج به في هذه الكتب، كما فعل ذلك في كتاب المباحث المشرقية وغيره. ولعل الذين قدحوا في أدلته هذه، كـ الآمدي والأبهري والأرموي صاحب لباب الأربعين وغيرهم، أخذوا ذلك - أو بعضه - من كلامه، أو أخذوه هم من حيث أخذه هو. وهذا قد رأيته فإني كنت قد أرى اعتراض هؤلاء عليه أو بعض أجوبته، ثم أنظر بعد ذلك في كلام آخر له، فأجدهم قد أخذوا ذلك

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies