Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

produced by it, cannot conceivably coexist with it in time. It is conceivable, however, that action proceeds from it successively, so that the things it produces proceed from it one after another.

These thinkers laid down a false principle that exposed the falsity of their position: a complete cause, also called a complete causal agent, must coexist in time with its effect, such that the effect does not follow after it; and no effect can exist without a complete cause.

They used this to oppose the Jahmī and Mu'tazilī theologians, and those who agreed with them that the effect of a complete causal agent may—indeed, sometimes must—be delayed after it. These theologians said, “The Creator was a complete causal agent in eternity past, yet His effect was delayed after Him.” The former replied, “Rather, His effect must coexist with Him in time.”

The correct position is a third one: complete causation by an agent necessarily entails the effect, so that the effect follows immediately upon it, neither coexisting with it nor being delayed after it. Thus one says: “I broke the vessel, and it broke; I cut the rope, and it was severed; I divorced the woman, and she became divorced; I emancipated the slave, and he became free.”

Allah Most High says:

“His command, when He wills a thing, is only to say to it, ‘Be,’ and it is.”

Thus, when He brings something into being, it exists immediately after the Lord brings it into being, neither simultaneously with His bringing it into being nor after any delay. It may also be said that it exists simultaneously with His bringing it into being, meaning that it follows immediately upon it without delay.

Whatever He—glory be to Him—wills comes to be, its existence being necessitated by His will and power; and whatever He does not will does not come to be, because He has not willed it. Accordingly, everything other than Allah Most High must have a beginning and be preceded by nonexistence, for it comes into being only immediately after His bringing it into being,

مفعول له لا يعقل مقارنته له، لكن يعقل صدور الفعل عنه شيئاً بعد شيء، فتكون المفعولات صادرة عنه شيئاً بعد شيء. وهؤلاء أصلوا أصلاً فاسداً ظهر به فساد قولهم وهو أن العلة التامة التي تسمى المؤثر التام يجب أن يقارنه معلوله في الزمان بحيث لا يتأخر عنه، ولا يكون معلول إلا لعلة تامة. وهذا ناقضوا به المتكلمين الجهمية والمعتزلة، ومن وافقهم في قولهم: إن المؤثر التام يجوز، بل قد يجب، أن يتراخى عنه أثره، فقالوا: الباري كان في الأزل مؤثراً تاماً وتراخى عنه أثره. فقال أولئك: بل يجب أن يقارنه أثره. والصواب قول ثالث، وهو أن التأثير التام من المؤثر يستلزم الأثر، فيكون الأثر عقبه، لا مقارناً له، ولا متراخياً عنه. كما يقال: كسرت الإناء فانكسر، وقطعت الحبل فانقطع، وطلقت المرأة فطلقت وأعتقت العبد فعتق. قال تعالى: {إنما أمره إذا أراد شيئا أن يقول له كن فيكون} ، فإذا كون شيئاً كان عقب تكوين الرب له، لا يكون مع تكوينه ولا متراخياً عنه. وقد يقال: يكون مع تكوينه، بمعنى أنه يتعقبه لا يتراخى عنه. وهو سبحانه ما شاء كان ووجب بمشيئته وقدرته، وما لم يشأ لم يكن لعدم مشيئته له، وعلى هذا فكل ما سوى الله تعالى لا يكون إلا حادثاً مسبوقاً بالعدم، فإنه إنما يكون عقب تكوينه له،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies