Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

He said:

“If it is objected:

‘This would mean that the necessary existent is constituted by contingent existents, which is impossible.’

We reply:

‘If by “necessary” and “contingent” you mean what we have stated, then that is precisely what we seek to establish, and we do not concede that it is impossible.

This is like someone saying: “It is impossible for something beginningless to be constituted by temporally originated things.” Yet time, according to them, is beginningless, while the individual entities are temporally originated and have beginnings, whereas the whole has no beginning. Thus, something without a beginning is constituted by entities with beginnings. Having beginnings applies to the individual entities but not to the whole.

Likewise, each individual cause is said to have a cause, but the whole is not said to have a cause. Not everything that holds true of the individuals must hold true of the whole, for it holds true of each individual that it is one, that it is a portion, and that it is

قال: (فإن قيل: فهذا يؤدي إلى أن يتقوم واجب الوجود بممكنات الوجود، وهو محال. قلنا: إن أردتم بالواجب والممكن ما ذكرناه، فهو نفس المطلوب، فلا نسلم أنه محال. وهو كقول القائل: يستحيل أن يتقوم القديم بالحوادث، والزمان عندهم قديم، وآحاد الذوات حادثة، وهي ذات أوائل، والمجموع لا أول له، فقد تقوم ما لا أول له بذوات أوائل، وصدق ذوات أوائل على الآحاد، ولم يصدق على المجموع. وكذلك يقال على كل واحد: إن له علة، ولا يقال: للمجموع علة، وليس كل ما صدق على الآحاد يلزم أن يصدق على المجموع، إذ يصدق على كل واحد أنه واحد، وأنه بعض، وأنه

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies