Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

alone, they turn their backs in aversion.’”

He said:

“The speculative theologians have followed one path in establishing the Maker’s existence: inferring from things that come into being a Maker who brings them into being. The ancient philosophers have followed another path: inferring from the contingency of contingent beings a determinant that gives preponderance to one of the two alternatives. Each claims that his inference yields necessary, self-evident knowledge.”

He said:

“I say: what temporal origination attests to, or indicates after the premises have been established, falls short of what the human innate disposition attests to: one’s own need for a Governor who is the ultimate recourse for every need. One therefore turns to Him in longing and does not turn away from Him, finds sufficiency in Him but cannot do without Him, directs oneself toward Him and does not shun Him, and seeks refuge in Him amid hardships and grave concerns. For one’s own need is clearer to oneself than the need of an external contingent being for the Necessary Being,

وحده ولوا على أدبارهم نفورا} . قال: (وقد سلك المتكلمون طريقاً في إثبات الصانع، وهو الاستدلال بالحوادث على محدث صانع، وسلك الأوائل طريقاً آخر وهو الاستدلال بإمكان الممكنات على مرجح لأحد طرفي الإمكان، ويدعي كل واحد من جهة الاستدلال ضرورة وبديهة) . قال: (وأنا أقول ما شهد به الحدوث أو دل عليه بعد تقديم المقدمات، ودون ما شهدت به الفطرة الإنسانية من احتجاج ذاته إلى مدبر، هو منتهى مطلب الحاجات، فيرغب إليه ولا يرغب عنه، ويستغنى به ولا يستغنى عنه، ويتوجه إليه ولا يعرض عنه، ويفزع إليه في الشدائد والمهمات، فإن احتياج نفسه أوضح له من احتياج الممكن الخارج إلى الواجب،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies