Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

Thus, every case that arises is covered by the Lawgiver’s address and encompassed by sound reasoning by analogy. The Lawgiver’s comprehensive, general address indicates its ruling through universal application, which involves establishing that the basis of the ruling is present in the particular case. This is equivalent to demonstrative syllogistic reasoning. Sound reasoning by analogy encompasses it through analogical inference, which entails treating like cases alike and distinguishing between unlike cases.

Similarity and difference are objective realities, and Allah has established evidence by which they may be recognized. Just as syllogistic and analogical reasoning rest on a single foundation and cannot contradict each other unless both, or one of them, are unsound, so too the general address and sound reasoning by analogy rest on a single foundation. They cannot contradict each other unless the inferences drawn from both are unsound, or the evidence supporting one of them is unsound.

This draws attention to the fundamental principles underlying all the reasoning of earlier and later thinkers. Anyone who examines this insightfully, understands it, and recognizes its comprehensive scope is thereby shown that the proofs of Allah Most High do not contradict one another; that what the Messenger, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, brought is the truth, consistent with the clear conclusions of reason; and that what He has prescribed for His servants is the justice through which their worldly life and their life in the Hereafter are set right.

And if, in addition, he understands the question of judging good and bad by reason, its connection with the question of suitable attributes, and how judgments of good and bad in general concern attaining what is loved and warding off what is disliked—that is, right and wrong—just as declarative statements in general concern existence and nonexistence; and that the former concerns what is true and beneficial, as opposed to falsehood that brings no benefit, whereas the latter concerns what is real

وحينئذ فكل من الحوادث شملها خطاب الشارع، وتناولها الاعتبار الصحيح. وخطاب الشارع العام الشامل دل عليها بطريق العموم الذي يرجع إلى تحقيق المناط، وهو في معنى قياس الشمول البرهاني. والاعتبار الصحيح تناولها بطريق قياس التمثيل، الذي يتضمن التسوية بين المتماثلين، والفرق بين المختلفين. والتماثل والاختلاف ثابت في نفس الأمر، وقد نصب الله عليه أدلة تدل عليه، وكما أن القياس الشمولي والتمثيلي يرجعان إلى أصل واحد، ولا يجوز تناقضهما إلا مع فسادهما أو فساد أحدهما، فكذلك الخطاب العام والاعتبار الصحيح يرجعان إلى أصل واحد، ولا يجوز تناقضهما إلا لفساد دلالتهما أو أدلة أحدهما. وهذا تنبيه على مجامع نظر الأولين والآخرين في جميع استدلالهم، ومن تبصر في ذلك وفهمه وعلم ما فيه من الأحاطة. وبين له أن دلائل الله تعالى لا تتناقض، وأن ما جاء به الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم هو الحق الموافق لصرائح المعقول، وأن ما شرعه للعباد هو العدل الذي به صلاح المعاش والمعاد، وإن فهم - مع ذلك - مسألة التحسين والتقبيح العقلي، وارتباطها بمسألة المناسبات، ورجوع جنس التحسين والتقبيح إلى حصول المحبوب ودفع المكروه - هو المعروف والمنكر - كما يرجع جنس الخبر إلى الوجود والعدم، وإن هذا يرجع إلى الحق النافع، وفي مقابلته الباطل الذي لا ينفع، وهذا يرجع إلى الحق

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies