Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

those who affirmed it.

Al-Bayhaqī and others thought that he had only condemned the doctrine of the Qadariyyah, saying:

“Al-Shāfi‘ī only condemned the doctrine of the Qadariyyah. Do you not see that he said, ‘anything of these deviant doctrines’? He preferred refraining from debate on the matter. Perhaps he had heard the hadith we narrated from ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb, may Allah be pleased with him, from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, who said:

‘Do not sit with those who deny divine decree or initiate debate with them.’

Or he may have heard other reports conveying the same meaning. Our imams followed this same course in earlier times, when there was no need to discuss the matter. When discussion became necessary, they responded with the evidence in the Book of Allah, and then in the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, affirming Allah’s decree and establishing that nothing occurs within the dominion of the heavens and the earth except by Allah’s judgment, power, and will. Likewise, in all other questions of

مثبته. وقد ظن البيهقي وغيره أنه إنما ذم مذهب القدرية فقال: (وإنما ذم الشافعي مذهب القدرية ألا تراه قال: بشيء من هذه الأهواء، واستحب ترك الجدال فيه وكأنه سمع ما رويناه عن عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه، عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم: أنه قال: «لا تجالسوا أهل القدر ولا تفاتحوهم» - الحديث، أو غير ذلك من الأخبار الواردة في معناه، وعلى مثل ذلك جرى أئمتنا في قديم الدهر عند الاستغناء عن الكلام فيه، فإذا احتاجوا إليه أجابوا بما في كتاب الله، ثم في سنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم من الدلالة على إثبات القدر لله تعالى، وأنه لا يجري في ملكوت السماوات والأرض شيء إلا بحكم الله وبقدرته وإرادته، وكذلك في سائر مسائل

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies