Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

Some of these statements he quoted from the book by Abū ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-Barr entitled The Merit of Knowledge and Its Practitioners, and Their Duties in Transmitting and Bearing It. Abū ‘Umar was among the most knowledgeable scholars of transmitted reports and of how to distinguish sound reports from unsound ones.

[Al-Ghazālī’s discussion in the Ihyā’ of a branch of speculative theology, and Ibn Taymiyyah’s commentary on it]

Among these is the statement that Abū Hāmid also quoted from Ahmad:

“Scholars of speculative theology are heretics.”

He said:

“Mālik said: ‘Consider this: if someone more skilled in argument than he comes along, is he to abandon his religion every day for a new one?’”

He said:

“He means that the disputants’ statements counter one another.”

He also said:

“Mālik said: ‘The testimony of people of deviant inclinations and religious innovation is inadmissible.’ Some of his companions explained his statement as meaning that by ‘people of deviant inclinations’ he meant practitioners of speculative theology, whatever school they followed.”

I say: The man whom Abū Hāmid left unnamed here is Muhammad ibn Khuwayz Mindād

وقد نقل من ذلك ما نقله من كتاب أبي عمر بن عبد البر، الذي سماه فضل العلم وأهله، وما يلزمهم في تأديته وحمله وأبو عمر من اعلم الناس بالآثار والتميز بين صحيحيها وسقيمها. [كلام الغزالي في الإحياء عن علم من الكلام وتعليق ابن تيمية عليه] ومن ذلك ما نقله أبو حامد أيضاً عن أحمد أنه قال (علماء الكلام زنادقة) . قال: (وقال مالك: أرأيت إن جاء من هو أجدل منه أيدع دينه كل يوم بدين جديد؟) . قال: (يعني أن أقوال المتجادلين تتقاوم) . وقال: (وقال مالك: لا تجوز شهادة أهل الأهواء والبدع. فقال بعض أصحابه في تأويله: انه أراد بأهل الأهواء: أهل الكلام على أي مذهب كانوا) . قلت: هذا الذي كنى عنه أبو حامد هو محمد بن خويز منداد

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies