Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

Tenth: The Quran affirms oneness in divinity through His words:

“And your god is one God.” [al-Baqarah: 62]

And His words:

“And Allah has said, ‘Do not take two gods. He is only one God, so fear Me alone.’” [al-Nahl: 51]

And His words, relating what the polytheists said:

“Has he made the gods into one God? Indeed, this is an astonishing thing.” [Sād: 5]

And other similar passages.

As for the claim that the eternal is one, or that the necessary existent is one, this is known only from the Jahmīs among the speculative theologians and philosophers. They said, “The eternal is one.” This is an ambiguous expression: it may mean that the eternal God is one, which is true; or it may mean that whatever is designated as eternal is one. They then said, “If we affirmed attributes for Him, there would be more than one eternal being.”

The Jahmīs among the philosophers said, “The necessary existent is one.” This too is ambiguous: it may mean the God whose existence is necessary in Himself, which is true; or it may mean whatever is designated as a necessary existent. They then said, “If we affirmed attributes for Him, there would be more than one necessary existent.”

It is well known that the monotheism taught in the Quran is the former, not the latter. The same applies to the monotheism taught by the Sunnah and agreed upon by the leading scholars. Thus, it becomes clear that the terms (tawhīd, “monotheism”), (al-Wāhid, “the One”), and (al-Ahad, “the One”), as they define and use them, differ from monotheism, al-Wāhid, and al-Ahad in the Quran, the Sunnah, scholarly consensus, and the language in which the Quran was revealed.

Thus, they cannot appeal as evidence to what occurs in the words of Allah and His messengers, and in

العاشر: أن القرآن أثبت الوحدانية في الإلهة بقوله: {وإلهكم إله واحد} [البقرة: ٦٢] ، وقوله: {وقال الله لا تتخذوا إلهين اثنين إنما هو إله واحد فإياي فارهبون} [النحل: ٥١] ، وقوله حكاية عن المشركين: {أجعل الآلهة إلها واحدا إن هذا لشيء عجاب} [ص: ٥] . وأمثال ذلك. وأما كون القديم واحداً، أو الواجب واحداً، فهذا إنما يعرف عن الجهمية من المتكلمين والفلاسفة، فإنهم قالوا: القديم واحد، وهو لفظ مجمل يراد به أن الإله القديم واحد، وهذا حق، ويراد به أن مسمى القديم واحد، ثم قالوا: لو أثبتنا له الصفات لكان القديم أكثر من واحد. وقالت جهمية الفلاسفة: الواجب واحد، وهو مجمل: يراد به الإله الواجب بذاته، وهذا حق. ويراد به مسمى الواجب ثم قالوا: لو أثبتنا له الصفات لتعدد الواجب. ومعلوم أن التوحيد الذي في القرآن هو الأول لا هذا، وكذلك التوحيد الذي جاءت به السنة، واتفق عليه الأئمة، فتبين أن لفظ (التوحيد) و (الواحد) و (الأحد) في وضعهم واصطلاحهم، غير التوحيد والواحد والأحد في القرآن والسنة والإجماع وفي اللغة التي جاء بها القرآن. وحينئذ فلا يمكنهم الاستدلال بما جاء في كلام الله ورسله وفي

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies