Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

that is straight * the path of those You have blessed, not those who have incurred Your anger, nor those who have gone astray.”
[al-Fātihah: 6–7].

Christians liken the created being to the Creator in attributes of perfection, while Jews liken the Creator to the created being in attributes of deficiency.

For this reason, the Quran condemns each group for the error into which it fell. If the descriptions in the Torah belonged to this category, there would have been the strongest reasons to denounce them, and doing so would have been among the most correct actions of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, the Companions, and their successors. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, would have denounced them in the same manner as those who negate the divine attributes.

We would then say that affirming these attributes entails corporeality, embodiment, likening Allah to His creation, and specifying how His attributes are, whereas Allah is exalted above all that. For most of those who negate these attributes reject them only on the grounds that they entail corporeality.

Among Muslims and the People of the Book are those who affirm embodiment. If this were corporeality and embodiment that had to be denounced, the Messenger would have been the first to denounce it and the most entitled to do so.

If the way to deny defects, deficiencies, and resemblance between the Creator and His creation were to identify the embodiment and corporeality involved, then denouncing these things by this method would have been the straight path—as was done by those speculative theologians who denounced them by this method and accepted its implications. Yet the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, his Companions, and their successors did not utter a single word of this; rather, what he said was

المستقيم * صراط الذين أنعمت عليهم غير المغضوب عليهم ولا الضالين} [الفاتحة: ٦-٧] . والنصارى يشبهون المخلوق بالخالق في صفات الكمال، واليهود تشبه الخالق بالمخلوق في صفات النقص. ولهذا أنكر القرآن على كل من الطائفتين ما وقعت فيه من ذلك، فلو كان ما في التوراة من هذا الباب لكان إنكار ذلك من اعظم الأسباب، وكان فعل النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم والصحابة والتابعين لذلك من أعظم الصواب، ولكان النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ينكر ذلك، من جنس إنكار النفاة. فنقول إثبات هذه الصفات يقتضي التجسيم والتجسيد والتشبيه والتكييف، والله منزه عن ذلك، فإن عامة النفاة إنما يردون هذه الصفات بأنها تستلزم التجسيم. ومن المسلمين وأهل الكتاب من يقول بالتجسيد، فلو كان هذا وتجسيماً وتجسيداً يجب إنكاره، لكان الرسول إلى إنكار ذلك أسبق وهو به أحق. وإن كان الطريق إلى نفي العيوب والنقائص، ومماثلة الخالق لخلقه، هو ما في ذلك من التجسيد والتجسيم، كان إنكار ذلك بهذا الطريق هو الصراط المستقيم، كما فعله من أنكر ذلك بهذا الطريق من القائلين بموجب ذلك من أهل الكلام، فلما لم ينطق النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ولا أصحابه ولا التابعون، بحرف من ذلك بل كان ما نطق به

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies