Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

the truthfulness of the two great messengers and the truth of the two noble Scriptures.

We said:

Had this contradicted what reason clearly establishes, two men such as these—who, together with others like them, possess the most perfect intellects of all people—would not have agreed upon it without their believing followers finding it problematic or their disbelieving enemies countering it with something that contradicts it.

They both say:

Muhammad’s acceptance of these statements from the People of the Scripture, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, without exposing any falsehood in them, is evidence that these are not among the lies they fabricated and attributed to Moses. This is also known from ordinary experience, for such statements are exceedingly numerous in the Torah. A vast and numerous community, spread throughout the East and West, has no interest in attributing lies to someone whom it holds in the highest reverence when those lies would discredit him and expose the unsoundness of his statements. They do, however, have an interest in fabricating lies through which they sustain their authority, preserve their religious law, and disparage the message brought by anyone who abrogates any part of it—just as they have an interest in disparaging Jesus son of Mary and Muhammad, may Allah bless them both and grant them peace.

Thus, if they say things that amount to disparaging Jesus and Muhammad, it is possible for them to collude in lying about them. But if they say things that amount to disparaging Moses, then, in the ordinary course of events, it is impossible for them to collude in this while knowing that it discredits Moses, just as it is impossible for Christians to collude in something they know discredits the Messiah.

ذلك على صدق الرسولين العظيمين، وصدق الكتابين الكريمين. وقلنا: إن هذا لو كان مخالفاً لصريح المعقول لم يتفق عليه مثل هذين الرجلين، اللذان هما وأمثالهما أكمل العالمين عقلاً، من غير أن يستشكل ذلك وليهما المصدق، ولا يعارض بما يناقضه عدوهما المكذب، ويقولان: إن إقرار محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم لأهل الكتاب على ذلك، من غير أن يبين كذبهم فيه، دليل على أنه ليس مما كذبوه وافتروا على موسى مع أن هذا معلوم بالعادة، فإن هذا في التوراة كثير جداً، وليس لأمة كثيرة عظيمة منتشرة في مشارق الأرض ومغاربها، غرض في أن تكذب على من تعظمه غاية التعظيم، بما يقدح فيه، وتبين فساد أقواله، ولكن لهم غرض في أن يكذبوا كذباً يقيمون به رياستهم وبقاء شرعهم، والقدح فيما جاء به من ينسخ شيئاً منها، كما لهم غرض في الطعن على عيسى بن مريم وعلى محمد صلى الله عليهما وسلم، فإذا قالوا ما هو من جنس القدح فيه عيسى ومحمد كان تواطؤهم على الكذب فيه ممكن، فإما إذا قالوا ما هو من جنس القدح في موسى فيمتنع تواطؤهم على ذلك في العادة، مع علمهم بأنه يقدح في موسى، كما يمتنع تواطؤ النصارى على ما يعلمون انه قدح في المسيح.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies