Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

arises in knowledge in the form of going astray and leading others astray, and what arises in the will in the form of following desires. He likewise brought the two together in His saying:

“They follow nothing but conjecture and what their souls desire, though guidance has already come to them from their Lord.”
[Al-Najm: 23]

He first said:

“And among the people is he who disputes about Allah without knowledge.”
[Al-Hajj: 3]

Anyone who disputes about Allah without guidance or an illuminating Book also disputes without knowledge. To negate knowledge is to negate anything that constitutes knowledge, however it is acquired. This therefore rules out his disputing on the basis of guidance or an illuminating Book. Yet this is the condition of the misguided follower of someone who leads him astray, so no detailed explanation was needed. He thus explained that such a person disputes without knowledge and follows every rebellious devil. It has been decreed concerning that devil that he will lead astray whoever takes him as an ally and guide him to the punishment of the Blazing Fire.

This is the condition of someone who follows the leaders of misguidance among the People of the Book and the adherents of religious innovations. They dispute about Allah without knowledge and follow devils among the jinn and humankind who lead them astray.

He then mentioned the condition of the leader whom others follow, who turns away arrogantly, as He said:

“And when Our verses are recited to him, he turns away arrogantly, as though he had not heard them.”
[Luqmān: 7]

And He said:

“He neither believed nor prayed * But denied and turned away * Then went to his family, strutting arrogantly.”
[Al-Qiyāmah: 31–33]

This type disputes in order to lead others astray from Allah’s path. His disputation, too, is without knowledge, but his condition was described in detail: He explained that he does not dispute on the basis of guidance, such as a believer’s faith, nor on the basis of a Book

يعرض في العلم من الضلال والإضلال، وما يعرض في الإرادة من اتباع الشهوات، كما جمع بينهما في قوله: {إن يتبعون إلا الظن وما تهوى الأنفس ولقد جاءهم من ربهم الهدى} [النجم: ٢٣] . فقال أولا: {ومن الناس من يجادل في الله بغير علم} [الحج: ٣] ، وكل من جادل في الله بغير هدى ولا كتاب منير، فقد جادل بغير علم أيضا، فنفي العلم يقتضي نفي كل ما يكون علماً بأي طريق حصل، وذلك ينفي أن يكون مجادلاً بهدىً أو كتاب منير، ولكن هذه حال الضال المتبع لمن يضله، فلم يحتج إلى تفصيل، فبين أنه يجادل بغير علم ويتبع كل شيطان مريد، كتب على ذلك الشيطان أنه من تولاه فأنه يضله ويهديه إلى عذاب السعير. وهذه حال مقلد أئمة الضلال بين أهل الكتاب وأهل البدع، فإنهم يجادلون في الله بغير علم، ويتبعون من شياطين الجن والإنس من يضلهم. ثم ذكر حال المتبوع الذي يثنى عطفيه تكبراً كما قال: {وإذا تتلى عليه آياتنا ولى مستكبرا كأن لم يسمعها} [لقمان: ٧] . وقال: {فلا صدق ولا صلى * ولكن كذب وتولى * ثم ذهب إلى أهله يتمطى} [القيامة: ٣١ -٣٣] . وهذا النوع يجادل ليضل عن سبيل الله، وجداله بغير علم أيضا، ولكن فصل حاله، فبين أنه لا يجادل بهدىً كأيمان المؤمن، ولا بكتاب

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies