Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

Others claim that they say such things on the basis of their own reason and opinion.

Allah has mentioned all these together in His words:

“And who is more unjust than one who invents a lie about Allah or says, ‘It has been revealed to me,’ when nothing has been revealed to him, or one who says, ‘I will reveal the like of what Allah has revealed’?” [al-An‘ām: 93]

Thus, He—glorified be He—mentions those who fabricate lies about Allah, those who say that revelation comes to them, and those who claim to produce words like the words Allah has revealed.

This principle, in its general sense, is necessarily known as part of the religion of the messengers: when Allah sends a messenger, only a disbeliever would utter words that contradict and oppose his words. What, then, of someone who gives his own words precedence over the messenger’s words? As for those who believe in what he brought, it is inconceivable that they should give their own statements precedence over his. Indeed, Allah has taught them proper conduct through His words:

“Do not put yourselves before Allah and His Messenger.” [al-Hujurāt: 1]

Religious innovations, however, derive from disbelief. Hence, opposing texts authentically transmitted from the prophets with human opinions is one of the branches of disbelief, even if the person who opposes these texts with such opinions believes in what the Messenger brought in matters outside the point of conflict.

Since opposing the divine scriptures with the statements of so-and-so is itself one of the foundations of disbelief, it follows that all such opposition is false.

This is something the believer ought to reflect upon, for if he calls himself to account in this regard, he will recognize its truth.

Further clarification of this is as follows:

وقوم يزعمون أنهم يقولون ذلك بعقلهم ورأيهم. وقد جمع الله هؤلاء بقوله: {ومن أظلم ممن افترى على الله كذبا أو قال أوحي إلي ولم يوح إليه شيء ومن قال سأنزل مثل ما أنزل الله} [الأنعام: ٩٣] . فذكر سبحانه من يفترى الكذب على الله، ومن يقول أنه يوحى إليه، ومن زعم أنه يقول كلاماً مثل الكلام الذي أنزله الله. وهذا الأصل هو مما يعلم بالضرورة من دين الرسل من حيث الجملة: يعلم أن الله إذا أرسل رسولاً، فإنما يقول من يناقض كلامه ويعارضه من هو كافر، فكيف بمن يقدم كلامه على كلام الرسول؟ ‍‍‍‍ وأما المؤمنون بما جاء به فلا يتصور أن يقدموا أقوالهم على قوله، بل قد أدبهم الله بقوله: {لا تقدموا بين يدي الله ورسوله} [الحجرات: ١] . ولكن البدع مشتقة من الكفر، فلهذا كانت معارضة النصوص الثابتة عن الأنبياء بآراء الرجال هي من شعب الكفر، وإن كان المعارض لهذا بهذا يكون مؤمناً بما جاء به الرسول في غير محل التعارض. وإذا كان أصل معارضة الكتب الإلهية بقول فلان وفلان من أصول الكفر، علم أن ذلك كله باطل. وهذا مما ينبغي للمؤمن تدبره، فإنه إذا حاسب نفسه على ذلك، علم تصديق ذلك. ومما بين هذا:

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies