Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

This is why those among the practitioners of speculative theology and rational inquiry who went astray did so in matters involving statements of fact: they opposed what Allah declares about Himself and His creation with their own reason and opinions. Those among the practitioners of worship and jurisprudence who went astray did so in prescriptive matters: they opposed Allah’s commands, which constitute His divine law, with their own desires and opinions.

The point here is that opposing the statements of the Messengers with those of others is a practice of the unbelievers, as Allah Most High says:

“None dispute concerning Allah’s signs except those who disbelieve, so do not be deceived by their movement throughout the land.”
[Ghāfir: 4]

Further in the passage, He says:

“They disputed with falsehood to refute the truth thereby, so I seized them. How severe was My punishment!”
[Ghāfir: 5]

Allah Most High also says:

“We send the Messengers only as bearers of good tidings and warners. Yet those who disbelieve dispute with falsehood to refute the truth thereby.”
[Al-Kahf: 56]

His words:

“None dispute concerning Allah’s signs except those who disbelieve.”
[Ghāfir 4]

confirm the saying of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace:

“Disputing about the Quran is disbelief.”

It is well known that anyone who opposes the Quran and argues against it on the basis of his own reason and opinions falls within the scope of this statement, even if he does not claim to give his own words precedence over the words of Allah and His Messenger. Indeed, if he says anything that gives rise to uncertainty and doubt concerning Allah’s words, he falls within its scope. What, then, of someone who claims that what he says on the basis of his own reason and opinions takes precedence over the texts of the Quran and Sunnah?

ولهذا كان ضلال من ضل من أهل الكلام والنظر في النوع الخبري، بمعارضة خبر الله عن نفسه وعن خلقه بعقلهم ورأيهم، وضلال من ضل من أهل العبادة والفقه في النوع الطلبي، بمعارضة أمر الله الذي هو شرعه بأهوائهم وآرائهم. والمقصود هنا أن معارضة أقوال الرسل بأقوال غيرهم من فعل الكفار، كما قال تعالى: {ما يجادل في آيات الله إلا الذين كفروا فلا يغررك تقلبهم في البلاد} [غافر: ٤] ، إلى قوله: {وجادلوا بالباطل ليدحضوا به الحق فأخذتهم فكيف كان عقاب} [غافر: ٥] . وقوله تعالى: {وما نرسل المرسلين إلا مبشرين ومنذرين ويجادل الذين كفروا بالباطل ليدحضوا به الحق} [الكهف: ٥٦] . وقوله تعالى: {ما يجادل في آيات الله إلا الذين كفروا} [غافر ٤] ، مصدق لقول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم: «مراء في القرآن كفر» . ومن المعلوم أن كل من عارض القرآن، وجادل في ذلك بعقله ورأيه، فهو داخل في ذلك، وإن لم يزعم تقديم كلامه على كلام الله ورسوله، بل إذا قال ما يوجب المرية والشك في كلام الله، فقد دخل في ذلك، فكيف بمن يزعم أن ما يقوله بعقله ورأيه مقدم على نصوص الكتاب والسنة.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies