Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

it is said: ‘He is not nonexistent.’ Likewise, He is not described as powerful, knowing, or living; rather, it is said: ‘He is neither powerless, nor ignorant, nor dead.’”

He said: “This is the doctrine of the philosophers and the Bātiniyyah. As for those who went to extremes in affirmation, they held beliefs that necessarily committed them to asserting that the Eternal One resembles created things.”

[Ibn Taymiyyah’s commentary]

I say:

All the groups agree with Abū al-Ma‘ālī on the importance of attending to this foundational principle.

The position he attributed to those who deny the attributes is the doctrine of the Jahmiyyah described by Imam Ahmad. Thus, it is reported that Jahm would not call Allah a ‘thing.’ It is also reported that he would not call Him by any name used for created beings, such as the Living, the Knowing, the All-Hearing, or the All-Seeing. Rather, he called Him Powerful and Creator, because, in his view, the servant has no power, as he was the leader of the Jahmiyyah who advocated compulsion.

And since any two existent beings must agree in some

يقال: ليس بمعدوم وكذلك لا يوصف بانه قادر عالم حي بل يقال: ليس بعاجز ولا جاهل ولا ميت. قال وهذا مذهب الفلاسفة والباطنية وأما الغلاة في الإثبات فاعتقدوا ما يلزمهم القول بمماثلة القديم الحوادث. [تعليق ابن تيمية] قلت: وهذا الذي قاله أبو المعالي من الاعتناء بهذا الأصل متفق عليه بين الطوائف، والذي ذكره عن النفاة هو قول الجهمية الذي ذكره الإمام أحمد ولهذا نقلوا عن جهم أنه لا يسمى الله بشيء ونقلوا عنه أنه لا يسميه باسم من الأسماء التي يسمي بها الخلق: كالحي والعالم والسميع والبصير بل يسميه قادراً خالقاً لأن العبد عنده ليس بقادر إذ كان هو رأس الجهمية الجبرية. ولما كان كل موجودين لا بد أن يكون بينهما اتفاق من بعض

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies