Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

(may Allah bless him and grant him peace):

“Abraham told only three lies, all of them for Allah’s sake.”

And Khubayb’s words:

“This is for God’s sake; and if He wills,
He will bless the limbs of a body torn apart.”

In these and similar expressions, the meaning is “in Allah’s cause,” that is, “for Allah Most High.” This is why Ibn Burhān and others objected to the theologians’ use of the expression dhāt Allah (“the essence of Allah”).

Since this is so, you have applied the word dhāt (essence) in a way the Arabs did not, without authorization from revelation. If someone were to say to you, “Allah is not an essence,” you would dispute his statement. Your opponent says the same regarding the terms “substance” and “body,” if he agrees with you on their meanings.

Furthermore, in the terminology of all of you, the terms “substance” and “body” have acquired a broader meaning than they had in Arab usage, for the Arabs do not call everything that occupies space

صلى الله عليه وسلم: «لم يكذب إبراهيم إلا ثلاث كذبات كلهن في ذات الله» . وقول خبيب وذلك في ذات الإله وإن يشأ ... يبارك على أوصال شلو ممزع وأمثال ذلك أي في جهة الله أي لله تعالى. ولهذا أنكر ابن برهان وغيره على المتكلمين إطلاق لفظ ذات الله. وإذا كان كذلك فأنت أطلقت لفظ الذات على ما لم تطلقه العرب بغير إذن من الشرع. ولو قال لك قائل: إن الله ليس بذات. نازعته. فهكذا يقول منازعك في اسم الجوهر والجسم إذا كان موافقاً لك على معناهما. وأيضاً فإن لفظ الجوهر والجسم قد صار في أصطلاحكم جميعاً أعم مما استعملت فيه العرب فإن العرب لا تسمي كل متحيز

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies